The Sun forced to apologise to Amanda
 

I see. I mentioned the wig somewhere so of course I take it back as it's not true.
Bloody tabloids.

Its impossible to be an error. Why do they not just admit they totally made **** up just to be dickheads?

I knew it was BS , her hair looks real she even ties it up a few times . It is possible for a woman in her 80's to still have a full head of hair .

Mess :skull:

And some people actually believe these rubbishy tabloids.

Maybe it was her fanny wig.

Told you, you should read the Daily Mail, but No............:laugh::laugh:

I wouldn't take at face value near anything any paper says.
I won't call them newspapers purposely.

Pathetic the lot of them.

I still don’t get why people still read this disgusting excuse for a paper

The Sun were only reporting what the Daily Star said tbf

My experience of a local papers so called reporter was when there was flooding in our area.

This reporter interviewed us all, got everything muddled up and attributed wrong names to wrong addresses, wrong damage to wrong houses and when we took it up with the paper, we were told they couldn't care less.

This is where the tabloid reporters of today supposedly learn their jobs.

Wasn't there a male HM who wore a wig in a recent civi series, and had it in his contract that he's not shown without it?

Anyway, unless Amanda had a wig to deliberately look messy and "not done yet" in the mornings, it was obviously BS

Snatch em bald Mandy!

:skull:

i'm not gonna lie when i first saw her i thought she was wearing a wig :skull:

Sue them Manda!
https://uploadir.com/u/mntxa5pd

What's so bad about wearing a wig. The women have worn extensions throughout the years, a wig is no different.

There may have been a hint of ageism in the article but when Amanda's hair was styled it looked very thick and looked good.

The murkin - of course.

Yes nasty basts, if she had wanted to wear a wig then whats the problem ?