A solution to this mess
 

I've long said it, allowing the most boring people to kick out the best housemates is crazy.

Makes no sense, because you end up with the dullest people in the final.

Happens every time.

We had a situation yesterday, two of the best housemates up, Hardeep and Natalie. That was just so wrong.

That's like asking which one don't you want, ice cream or cake, when a lot of people love both.

Surely it's better to ask, which one don't you want, ice cream, cake, boiled fish eyes or chicken in a can.

Then we get a more fair result.

Surely the solution to the current kind of mess is to put up every single housemate for the first three evictions.

This would mean the likes of Gabby, Jermaine and Ben would go before Natalie or Hardeep.

Then we can return to normal nominations, and if Natalie goes after that then fine. Least we had a good time with her.

I don’t think there’s any big term solution that won’t be tacky but it’d be nice if the first eviction wasn’t a 1v1

So no nominations for the first 3 evictions? :fist: When it's only a 3 and a half week series

You wouldn't look at the list of winners and say that they were the most boring.

The most annoying ones tend to go early, and that's all good.

Colleen Nolan tea

Delusional fans have cried for years to bring head to head evictions back. That's what you get out of it. VTS is not needed with this format either.

Translated

We want Big Brother to be a freak show

If they have VTS, then they should have at least 3 people up for eviction

That will give the strong characters more chance

:clap1::clap1::clap1: Well said, BBDodge. Bang on.

Further translation:

Some want the rules changed only when their particular favourites are evicted under the existing rules.

Lots of dummies being spat out this morning, no wonder this show is no longer what it once was, people want non stop drama rather than social interaction

Fake drama > any interaction between gabby Chloe and the lads!!!