ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums

ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/index.php)
-   Serious Debates & News (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=61)
-   -   why is there more outrage at Meghan than Prince Andrew? (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/showthread.php?t=364715)

Amy Jade 29-01-2020 10:19 AM

why is there more outrage at Meghan than Prince Andrew?
 
all shes done is try to escape a lifestyle that she nor her husband wanted to be in...prince Andrew was best mates with a peado and is looking likely to be one himself yet the media are still more interested in painting Meghan as some sort of super villain

Beso 29-01-2020 10:23 AM

If they didn't want to be in that lifestyle why would they want to continue working for the royals for certain things?

Niamh. 29-01-2020 10:24 AM

I would say I was baffled by it but I'm not at all, I can think of at least 3 reasons why

Livia 29-01-2020 10:29 AM

Hmmm not for me. I'm equally disinterested in them all. Andrew needs to get his arse over the the States and answer any question they ask him. If he doesn't he's guilty...that's what it'll look like, and I can't see any other reason not to face the music.

Meghan's been part of the royal family for just a couple of years. She married Harry, one of everyone's royal favourites. Everyone remembers the little boy walking behind his Mum's coffin and I think we all took him under our wing. Meghan arrives and Harry's personality seemed to change. Now they don't want to be part of the royal family any more, they don't want to take part in royal duties... but they DO want to keep the brand "Sussex Royal", even though neither of them is now an HRH. It's going to include clothes designed by Meghan, apparently. I don't need a TV actress from California to tell me how to dress and I don't need her to tell me how to save the world.

I'd be happy if all three of them disappeared from public life now.

Amy Jade 29-01-2020 10:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by parmnion (Post 10765664)
If they didn't want to be in that lifestyle why would they want to continue working for the royals for certain things?

if you mean charity work then presumably because it's one of the things they enjoy about being in the royal family. they are both clearly very passionate about certain organisations they help

Livia 29-01-2020 10:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Amy Jade (Post 10765672)
if you mean charity work then presumably because it's one of the things they enjoy about being in the royal family. they are both clearly very passionate about certain organisations they help

When you say "help", AJ... they travel first class and get their picture taken. Now I know it's great that they use their fame to raise important issues, but please don't ask me to believe that what they do is "work". It's just privileged people on a jolly.

Amy Jade 29-01-2020 10:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Livia (Post 10765675)
When you say "help", AJ... they travel first class and get their picture taken. Now I know it's great that they use their fame to raise important issues, but please don't ask me to believe that what they do is "work". It's just privileged people on a jolly.

well I'm not denying mistakes were made around that situation, however the fact the replies here so far have been heavily negative of meghan while prince andrew the peado is not spoken of speaks volumes.

the charity I know meghan is a patron of and still will be is a dogs home in london btw

thesheriff443 29-01-2020 10:45 AM

Epstein is dead and will not face justice,but claims against his fortune will be made.

Can anyone see prince Andrew going to prison for these allegations against him?

People are not interested in this case or Andrew.

arista 29-01-2020 10:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Amy Jade (Post 10765660)
all shes done is try to escape a lifestyle that she nor her husband wanted to be in...prince Andrew was best mates with a peado and is looking likely to be one himself yet the media are still more interested in painting Meghan as some sort of super villain



Outrage : It what she preaches.

It get folks angry.

Marsh. 29-01-2020 10:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Livia (Post 10765670)
Hmmm not for me. I'm equally disinterested in them all. Andrew needs to get his arse over the the States and answer any question they ask him. If he doesn't he's guilty...that's what it'll look like, and I can't see any other reason not to face the music.

Meghan's been part of the royal family for just a couple of years. She married Harry, one of everyone's royal favourites. Everyone remembers the little boy walking behind his Mum's coffin and I think we all took him under our wing. Meghan arrives and Harry's personality seemed to change. Now they don't want to be part of the royal family any more, they don't want to take part in royal duties... but they DO want to keep the brand "Sussex Royal", even though neither of them is now an HRH. It's going to include clothes designed by Meghan, apparently. I don't need a TV actress from California to tell me how to dress and I don't need her to tell me how to save the world.

I'd be happy if all three of them disappeared from public life now.

How is designing a clothing line telling you how to dress? Will you be forced to buy it? :laugh:

Unless you're Maria Von Trapp turning your nan's curtains into clothes, someone else is designing the clothing you wear and making it. :smug:

Amy Jade 29-01-2020 10:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by arista (Post 10765685)
Outrage : It what she preaches.

It get folks angry.

So people are more angry at a woman for being preachy than a man molesting a minor?

Amy Jade 29-01-2020 10:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by arista (Post 10765685)
Outrage : It what she preaches.

It get folks angry.

So people are more angry at a woman for being preachy than a man molesting a minor?

Niamh. 29-01-2020 10:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Amy Jade (Post 10765691)
So people are more angry at a woman for being preachy than a man molesting a minor?

Are you surprised?

Amy Jade 29-01-2020 11:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Niamh. (Post 10765692)
Are you surprised?

Yes! :laugh:

Alf 29-01-2020 11:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Amy Jade (Post 10765691)
So people are more angry at a woman for being preachy than a man molesting a minor?

We don't actually know he did do that, yet.

But no, I certainly would be more angry towards a child molester than a preachy woman. And I'd be equally as angry at anybody who knew about it and covered it up.

Livia 29-01-2020 11:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Amy Jade (Post 10765677)
well I'm not denying mistakes were made around that situation, however the fact the replies here so far have been heavily negative of meghan while prince andrew the peado is not spoken of speaks volumes.

the charity I know meghan is a patron of and still will be is a dogs home in london btw

You say Prince Andrew is a paedo. But there is no evidence to prove that except a photo, allegedly of him with his arm around a young girl. The picture is a copy of a copy... as evidence, it's pretty thin. I'm not making excuses for him, I'm merely pointing out that there is no hard evidence. I do think he should be speaking to the US police, though.

I think the feelings people had about Meghan at first were quite different from what they are now. The press is despicable. But you can't say we didn't all know that. Who here even reads the tabloid press? And who doesn't take it with a huge pinch of salt.

We have her self-indulgent "why aren't people asking me how I am?" interview with Tom Bradby, but not much more, because despite the privileged life she stepped into, one that she had been repeatedly warned about by her own admission, she's not been happy with it from the start. Now they want out. Great. Go.... And leave your royal brand behind you if you're going to do nothing to earn it.

Just my opinion of course.


Quote:

Originally Posted by Marsh. (Post 10765686)
How is designing a clothing line telling you how to dress? Will you be forced to buy it? :laugh:

Unless you're Maria Von Trapp turning your nan's curtains into clothes, someone else is designing the clothing you wear and making it. :smug:

What I mean Marshy, is that she's not a designer, but she's going to be offering her clothes to women. Like her "style" is all her own. And you know, if she wants to do that, great! I hope it works out for her. But she wants to do it under the "Sussex Royal" brand. But she doesn't want to be part of the royal family. Seems a little... Machiavellian to me.

Niamh. 29-01-2020 11:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Amy Jade (Post 10765697)
Yes! :laugh:

You are young.....but you will learn :p

Livia 29-01-2020 11:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Amy Jade (Post 10765691)
So people are more angry at a woman for being preachy than a man molesting a minor?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Niamh. (Post 10765692)
Are you surprised?

I'm pretty surprised. Unless TiBB has unearthed some evidence?

Kizzy 29-01-2020 11:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Amy Jade (Post 10765697)
Yes! :laugh:

Don't be, it's the way it is but by all means keep calling it out, it helps :laugh:

Mystic Mock 29-01-2020 11:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Amy Jade (Post 10765660)
all shes done is try to escape a lifestyle that she nor her husband wanted to be in...prince Andrew was best mates with a peado and is looking likely to be one himself yet the media are still more interested in painting Meghan as some sort of super villain

I agree with you 100% Amy Jade.

If I didn't know any better I'd think that the Media have targeted Meghan to make people forget about the investigation on Andrew.

Niamh. 29-01-2020 11:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Livia (Post 10765706)
I'm pretty surprised. Unless TiBB has unearthed some evidence?

Ohhhhh sorry I forgot, it couldn't have been him because he was eating Pizza and not sweating at the time or something

Livia 29-01-2020 11:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mystic Mock (Post 10765709)
I agree with you 100% Amy Jade.

If I didn't know any better I'd think that the Media have targeted Meghan to make people forget about the investigation on Andrew.

Why would they do that? What would be the point? If we were talking about William, fair enough. But we're talking about Andrew. A minor royal, and not a very popular one.

Livia 29-01-2020 11:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Niamh. (Post 10765710)
Ohhhhh sorry I forgot, it couldn't have been him because he was eating Pizza and not sweating at the time or something

I don't know why you're making a joke here. I'm telling you there is no evidence. Do you think there is some? Forget the interview.... Evidence.

Niamh. 29-01-2020 11:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Livia (Post 10765712)
I don't know why you're making a joke here. I'm telling you there is no evidence. Do you think there is some? Forget the interview.... Evidence.

Sorry your honour

Marsh. 29-01-2020 11:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Livia (Post 10765703)
You say Prince Andrew is a paedo. But there is no evidence to prove that except a photo, allegedly of him with his arm around a young girl. The picture is a copy of a copy... as evidence, it's pretty thin. I'm not making excuses for him, I'm merely pointing out that there is no hard evidence. I do think he should be speaking to the US police, though.

I think the feelings people had about Meghan at first were quite different from what they are now. The press is despicable. But you can't say we didn't all know that. Who here even reads the tabloid press? And who doesn't take it with a huge pinch of salt.

We have her self-indulgent "why aren't people asking me how I am?" interview with Tom Bradby, but not much more, because despite the privileged life she stepped into, one that she had been repeatedly warned about by her own admission, she's not been happy with it from the start. Now they want out. Great. Go.... And leave your royal brand behind you if you're going to do nothing to earn it.

Just my opinion of course.




What I mean Marshy, is that she's not a designer, but she's going to be offering her clothes to women. Like her "style" is all her own. And you know, if she wants to do that, great! I hope it works out for her. But she wants to do it under the "Sussex Royal" brand. But she doesn't want to be part of the royal family. Seems a little... Machiavellian to me.

See I think there's a difference between the official duties required of them to fulfil for the public/country and the titles/family name that they own/inherit that is theirs to do as they please. :shrug: The names/titles are just that.


All times are GMT. The time now is 01:35 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.