Rock Star Mick Jagger seduced a 15 year old girl in 1977
 

https://ichef.bbci.co.uk/news/624/cp..._mos-final.jpg

Flae Dawn Chung (young actress)
says he had his way
when she was 15?


[Mick Jagger seduced me when I was 15: Actress Rae Dawn
reveals how she spent night with Rolling Stone
when she was underage and he was married to Bianca

Rae Dawn reveals she and Mick Jagger had fling in 1977 while he was still married
The actress, now a 58-year-old grandmother, insists the fling was consensual
She accidentally blurted out during podcast that she had sex with Mick Jagger
She was 15 and two years under age of consent at the time,
and he was aged 33


https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2020/02...0601814386.jpg
[No victim: Rae Dawn is
pictured as she is today.
She says she is only speaking
out to 'own' the story after accidentally
blurting out during a podcast
that she had sex with Jagger
when she was two years under
the age of consent]


[As she rises to leave she says:
'This is my story. I can only tell it as I see it.
This is my truth. Yes, I was only 15.
But it was my body, my choice, my decision.']


https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...e-married.html

he's always given me a creep vibe

It was 1977
he was 33.

But that young girl
appears to let him seduce her?

So no Rape.
But of course she is under the legal age for sex.

https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2020/02...0593268803.jpg
[Raunchy: Jagger gets close to Rae Dawn Chong in the video for his 1985 track Just Another Night.
She later complained that he was ‘licky’ on the shoot]

..there is no consensual if she was underage, she was a child...he seduced a child...


...the title...’bonked’...seriously, Arista...you’re referring to him having seduced a child as ‘bonked’..?...jeeez...

...I wonder if you would refer to it the same, had it been your daughter who he seduced as an underage...

Mandy Smith was just 13 when she started dating former Stone, Bill Wyman. They ended up getting married.

Bonked
is a OK

Its like you say the Loo

I say BOG....................

Yes she was Seduced as well

The Power
of a Rock Star.

...no it’s not the same at all..it has a slang definition which would imply consensual to a sexual act...and that can’t ever apply to an underage because they’re a child...just because someone was all ‘rock n roll’ doesn’t make it any other than what it was...In some cases, rock n roll abused it’s position with children...

...’the power of...’...interesting this story is side by side with the Epstein/Andrew one...

[British
have sexual intercourse.
"the young couple bonking upstairs"]

Sure but he as the 33 year old Rock Star
bonked her

Well this thread has put me off The Rolling Stones for life.

Thats fair enough

Is anyone really surprised???? :bored: , Jagger isn't the only one .

Thats nothing to do with this.

What about other rock stars ? , Let's not pretend now :notimpressed:

It is statutory rape

He was 33 and married

...I’m not really sure what that means, why you’re posting it...’the young couple’..?...she wasn’t part of a couple, she was a child ...he was having sex with a child and you’re implying that they were a couple..?..a child is unable to give their consent to a sexual act for obvious reasons ...

...just reading on from it in the article...she woke up and Kieth Richards was standing over the bed, staring at them...it’s all very creepy and it’s completely wrong on any level and in any definition...and then she goes on to mention the #metoo movement and refers to ‘men and women’...but she wasn’t a woman, she was a child....

Why not? anyone can have 'groupies' stars, royals and the super rich.
She may not feel she was exploited but nevertheless she was.

Sure but
she has now stated:
[Yes, I was only 15.
But it was my body, my choice, my decision]

...the link I made was only using your words..’the power of...’...Those men having power over females Or power over children...?...what’s the power, Arista...what’s the power of a rock star....all there is, is an abuse of power...

Sure Abuse of Power

...(...it was not her body, her choice, her decision as a minor and a child...)...I can’t see how you can’t see that, Arista...do we only want the law to protect children at adult convenience...?...only on our terms..?..