ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums

ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/index.php)
-   Serious Debates & News (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=61)
-   -   Ruth Bader Ginsburg has passed away (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/showthread.php?t=370155)

Josiah. 18-09-2020 11:49 PM

Ruth Bader Ginsburg has passed away
 
Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, the demure firebrand who in her 80s became a legal, cultural and feminist icon, died Friday. The Supreme Court announced her death, saying the cause was complications from metastatic cancer of the pancreas.

The court, in a statement, said Ginsburg died at her home in Washington surrounded by family. She was 87.

Read more: https://www.npr.org/2020/09/18/10030...ity-dies-at-87

MB. 18-09-2020 11:53 PM

I literally just watched the documentary about her on Netflix this week... RIP

LaLaLand 18-09-2020 11:53 PM

An absolute legend. RIP.

arista 18-09-2020 11:54 PM

https://news.sky.com/story/us-suprem...-dies-12075701


Yes she was very ill with cancer

MB. 18-09-2020 11:57 PM

also, America's legal system is so broken that their entire democracy as we know it was essentially resting on the health of a single 87-year-old woman, so... the foreseeable future is not going to be pretty

Trouble1321075 19-09-2020 12:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Josiah. (Post 10916716)
Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, the demure firebrand who in her 80s became a legal, cultural and feminist icon, died Friday. The Supreme Court announced her death, saying the cause was complications from metastatic cancer of the pancreas.



The court, in a statement, said Ginsburg died at her home in Washington surrounded by family. She was 87.



Read more: https://www.npr.org/2020/09/18/10030...ity-dies-at-87

For real?

I didnt agree with her ideologically but i respect her. It would be a lie for ms to say im not glaf she is off the vdnch but sad its this way

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

Kate! 19-09-2020 02:09 AM

RIP

Ammi 19-09-2020 04:31 AM

...a great age for a great lady...:love:...

...”I’m a very strong believer in listening and learning from others”...such wisdom...

Strictly Jake 19-09-2020 07:03 AM

I thought this said ruth badger at first and was so shocked!

bitontheslide 19-09-2020 07:59 AM

she was a fighter all the way to the end, i think she endured 5 different cancer incidents

Ammi 19-09-2020 08:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bitontheslide (Post 10916748)
she was a fighter all the way to the end, i think she endured 5 different cancer incidents

...I think that her husband did as well...not 5 maybe, but he was a cancer survivor, I’m sure...before the disgusting disease did take him from his loved ones...

parmnion 19-09-2020 08:16 AM

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/w...t-b491380.html

Tom4784 19-09-2020 01:06 PM

She was an incredible person, a feminist icon and a trailblazer in many ways. The amount of good she has done in service to the people while holding her position cannot be understated. It's a true loss for the US as a whole, especially considering how that hypocrite Mitch McConnell has already put plans in motion to put a conservative judge in her place despite voting against judges being appointed in Election years before.

RBG upheld the values of her position incredibly well, and sadly, her death will be used as a method to ensure that the Supreme Court falls even further under republican rule. It makes me angry to think that a lot of the good she did will likely be overruled.

GiRTh 19-09-2020 01:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ammi (Post 10916729)
...a great age for a great lady...:love:...

...”I’m a very strong believer in listening and learning from others”...such wisdom...

A great loss. RIP

arista 19-09-2020 03:54 PM

Republicans vow to vote on Trump pick

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-54216710

Liam- 19-09-2020 04:10 PM

Of course they do, because they’re hypocrites

Trouble1321075 19-09-2020 04:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by arista (Post 10916911)
Republicans vow to vote on Trump pick

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-54216710

Why wouldn't they? If democrats could of gotten garland in they would of done it too.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

Trouble1321075 19-09-2020 04:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Liam- (Post 10916914)
Of course they do, because they’re hypocrites

Ginsburg could of stepped down while obama was president but instead she gambled with the seat and lost. The Republicans would be foolish to gamble on that seat when they have the power to name anyone they want.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

Liam- 19-09-2020 04:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Trouble1321075 (Post 10916916)
Why wouldn't they? If democrats could of gotten garland in they would of done it too.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

The nomination of Garland was blocked by republicans because it was deemed ‘too close’ to an election, mainly by McConnell and Grahame, if they decide to try and go ahead with it, despite their previous stance, it will make a mockery of the ‘system’

Trouble1321075 19-09-2020 06:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Liam- (Post 10916927)
The nomination of Garland was blocked by republicans because it was deemed ‘too close’ to an election, mainly by McConnell and Grahame, if they decide to try and go ahead with it, despite their previous stance, it will make a mockery of the ‘system’

Yup they sure did say that, and the democrats argued that the upcoming election didn't matter it was the sitting presidents privilege to get a vote on his nominee. Do they still feel that way or are the democrats hypocrites too?

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

Liam- 19-09-2020 06:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Trouble1321075 (Post 10917029)
Yup they sure did say that, and the democrats argued that the upcoming election didn't matter it was the sitting presidents privilege to get a vote on his nominee. Do they still feel that way or are the democrats hypocrites too?

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

They’re just trying to keep the republicans to their word

Trouble1321075 19-09-2020 08:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Liam- (Post 10917034)
They’re just trying to keep the republicans to their word

Right, there is nothing principled about the Democrats position either. Both sides are arguing from whatever is politically convenient in the moment.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

Tom4784 19-09-2020 08:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Trouble1321075 (Post 10916916)
Why wouldn't they? If democrats could of gotten garland in they would of done it too.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

Well considering most of the Republicans said that it would be unjust to nominate an SC judge before an election in 2016, they really shouldn't be outrageous hypocrites and do exactly that now the shoe is on the other foot.

LeatherTrumpet 19-09-2020 08:45 PM

Genuinely never heard of her

Tom4784 19-09-2020 08:46 PM

Honestly, being like 'BUT THE DEMOCRATS' is pointless. Republicans enforced a standard in 2016 that they themselves will not abide by in 2020. You can complain about the dems all you want but it's not gonna change the fact that the republicans are massive hypocrites.


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:08 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.