Fans are revoltin\'
 

From The Daily Star

BIG Brother fans have vowed to hijack tomorrow night’s live show to vent their rage over the Charley Uchea “fix” scandal.

Viewers were left fuming after producers stopped the hated housemate from being put up for eviction, fearing the show would die without her.

Now irate fans are urging those who attend the live show, hosted by Davina McCall, 39, to cause chaos as they gather outside Elstree TV Studios, Herts.

They plan to disrupt the broadcast by chanting “Charley Out! Charley Out!” and drowning Davina’s commentary.

Originally, the housemates were told that Carole Vincent, 53, Tracey Barnard, 37, Billi Bhatti, 25, Nicky Maxwell, 28, and 21-year-old Charley would all be facing the public vote on Friday.

However, there was a big shock when BB announced that, because Billi and Charley had been caught discussing nominations, they would be punished by having their votes scrapped.

Since Billi had polled eight votes from the housemates, his tally dropped to seven – still the highest number of nominations.

However, the move meant that superbitch Charley only got three votes and so dropped off the hit list.

The decision has caused uproar among dedicated BB fans, who had been chanting every Friday night to urge housemates to put her up for the chop.

Fan Jason, from Dorset, who runs www.bigbrotheronline.co.uk, said: “It’s no secret that people want Charley out and everyone expected her to be up
this week.

“But this so-called penalty gives her immunity from eviction.

“How can this be a punishment for Charley? It’s a gift.

“The only one suffering is Billi ... and the fans.”

BB bosses fear that, if Charley goes, the bores left in the house will cause fans to switch off.

Even Billi is starting to smell a rat. He said yesterday: “How is this a
punishment for Charley? She’s got off the hook.

“I would have felt safe if she was up against me for this eviction.

“I wanted to beat her – that would be better than winning Big Brother.”

And Carole said: “If this game is fixed to keeping one person in then it’s not a fair game.

“I imagine a lot of others wouldn’t want to continue playing.”

Last night a Channel 4 spokeswoman said of the “fix” allegations: “Big Brother reserves the right to give out punishments to housemates as it sees fit.”


Now now Amy! :laugh:

These people are a joke. Billi broke the rules and so got his noms cancelled. Failing that, they could have cancelled Ziggy's noms for cheating too.

I sincerely hope next time Charley's up, producers do fix it to save her, to give these people something to properly complain about.

im not surprized there mad i am shes been rewarded. i take i must be a moron aswell then oh well :tongue:

so big brother just made her chances worse.

well lets hope they fix the voting as well then..and tracey goes..

It IS a fix!!
These things are well thought out before they are implemented and BB knew this was the only way to keep charley.
Have u not heard Dermot CONSTANTLY saying "we love her here because she's very entertaining".
BB seen what happened last year when nikki was evicted and then started voting people back in cos there that desperate.
I think its a disgrace and it will be interesting to see if they edit out all the housemates speculation over an unfair game!!

i can see why fans are angry
she should be up for nomination just like the others as she was put up!

:bored:

These supposed 'protests' have been planned several times before, yet failed to materialise. Even if they did keep to their word, Channel 4 would simply switch to plan B and carry on regardless.

As for Charley supposedly getting preferential treatment, what's new? Cameron revealed his sickening homophobic beliefs during BB4, yet still went on to win. Victor & Jason discussed nominations literally every night throughout BB5, yet got away with it virtually every time. By rights, they should never have been allowed to take part in the nomination process at all. Jason (despite being 'sexually confused' himself, to say the least) was guilty of numerous instances of homophobic bullying, yet was never even warned about it ('fight night' being the one exception). Victor physically assaulted a woman, yet wasn't removed from the house for it - his victim was instead. His next act of sickening aggression towards a woman may have saw him voted out, but he should've been removed by BB immediately instead. Nadia was given free tobacco to stop her from walking. Makosi was given preferential treatment throughout BB6, and nominations were effectively engineered to ensure her survival. Dawn (BB7) outsmarted BB, and asked to leave. Once she'd told them what she'd done, they conducted a blatant smear campaign against her, stating that she'd been removed when in fact she'd walked. Even Davina joined in on that one. Piggy's act of intimidation against a female housemate went without punishment. And this year (as with every other), numerous housemates have discussed nominations without any action being taken by BB. Even lesser things that seemed to matter previously have been overlooked this year. Last week, Jonathan's reasons for his nominations were pathetic, yet he was allowed to get away with it. And Liam is apparently allowed to wear a hat in the diary room, whilst Victor wasn't during BB5. The list of BB's selective punishments is endless.

At the end of the day there is only one winner - and you lot choose it. I personally feel if Charley was to go next week, the house would not be a livley and on edge as it has been.

Its a fix!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :mad:. Big Brother are being bias in favour of Charley like they did with Glynn last year (BB7). It isnt right or fair and Charley should of been up this week and evicted by Friday.

Woo revolution!

they were absolutely right to fix it. charley is a revolting human being but ultimately very watchable. the show would be ridiculously dull without her.

yet again you lot prove that you dont understand how BB works. you alway vote out the annoying ones leaving the house full of" nice but very dull people" and how the likes of cameron, anthony and pete end up winning and the real entertaining characters like nikki, kitten and victor dont

they were absolutely right to fix it. charley is a revolting human being but ultimately very watchable. the show would be ridiculously dull without her.

yet again you lot prove that you dont understand how BB works. you alway vote out the annoying ones leaving the house full of" nice but very dull people" and thats how the likes of cameron, anthony and pete end up winning and the real entertaining characters like nikki, kitten and victor dont

It was confirmed by Sam upon her exit last year that that twist was in the works , and that was long before Nikkis evicition , to that point your wrong but I do agree on alot of what you say.

Well i dont get why fans have never chanted that on live shows anyway.

Whatever the opinion on Charley or this situation , I still want this to happen as it will make for cracking viewing.

Big Brother should never fix things though, it was wrong of them, they should have thought of another punishemnt,

They would only do that because They hate Charley!

why is noone making a fuss over nicky's name been taken off along with charley's?.:puzzled:

Because people like Nicky more then Charley I expect.

There are always stupid conspiracy theories, like BB wanting Glyn to win because he was always featured on Little mouth but this one stinks. It is a fix to keep Charle in, no two ways about it.

Oh for gods sake, who cares about charley, its entertaining. the house would be dull without her.

those fans take it too seriously

its only a bloody tv show

I don't find her entertaining. I don't want a house like:

**** Off
No, You **** Off
Yeah but, noo but, **** Off

24/7

What a load of crap.
chanting should be banned

BB a fix?

I worked that out BB1 :laugh3: