ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums

ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/index.php)
-   Serious Debates & News (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=61)
-   -   Dominic Raab: men can be victims of misogyny (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/showthread.php?t=378100)

Oliver_W 06-10-2021 11:14 AM

Dominic Raab: men can be victims of misogyny
 


So along with women losing their name ("pregnant people", "people who menstruate") they can't even have a specific term for when they're victimised?

joeysteele 06-10-2021 11:19 AM

I wouldn't expect much that is right or makes sense from Raab.
Pretty scary that he is now deputy PM.

Niamh. 06-10-2021 11:23 AM

What an idiot, glad she pulled him up on that.

bots 06-10-2021 11:25 AM

how thick are the people in control?

Oliver_W 06-10-2021 11:42 AM

I guess it was possible he was answering the question as if she asked about sexism rather than specifically misogyny. But even then, the preamble was was about the "current" relevant topic of crimes against women and girls.

Niamh. 06-10-2021 11:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Oliver_W (Post 11101160)
I guess it was possible he was answering the question as if she asked about sexism rather than specifically misogyny. But even then, the preamble was was about the "current" relevant topic of crimes against women and girls.

Well whether he'd done it on purpose or because he thinks they're the same thing the effect he was going for the was the same, down playing it and pointing out that men can be victims of sexism too.

To me the difference between the two is something like this

Man 1 - Women are bad drivers
Man 2 - Women who wear short skirts deserve to be raped like the *****s they are

Cherie 06-10-2021 11:57 AM

I think he was trying too hard to be PC there and failed miserably

user104658 06-10-2021 12:05 PM

To be fair I think it was a slip up in his phrasing rather than not knowing what misogyny means, because he emphasised "insults" first, I think he intended to say "insulting language used against anyone".

However that's not really all that much better because it tries to make it a "both sides" issue and downplays the very obvious fact that misogyny is a much bigger issue in itself.

No least because insults aimed at women are usually focused on them being women - whereas if you look at insulting language used against straight men, very tellingly, the insult is intended for the man but the language used is actually very often misogynistic or homophobic. "Real men don't cry", "Showing too much emotion is girly", if you don't join in with making comments about women "you must be gay, arses to the wall!", or a common one that goes right back to most people's primary school days and covers both - "If you don't like football, you're a girl and/or gay" (because what could be worse than that??)

I largely agree that baseless insults being thrown around is never a good thing but trying to deny that misogyny is a much deeper-rooted problem than those simple surface insults is a massive cop-out. It's obviously a much larger issue, up there with racism and homophobia.

user104658 06-10-2021 12:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Niamh. (Post 11101162)
Well whether he'd done it on purpose or because he thinks they're the same thing the effect he was going for the was the same, down playing it and pointing out that men can be victims of sexism too.

To me the difference between the two is something like this

Man 1 - Women are bad drivers
Man 2 - Women who wear short skirts deserve to be raped like the *****s they are

The thing is though, if Man 1 would say the former as anything other than tongue-in-cheek/banter then in my experience he's only a pint and a half away from being Man 2.

Niamh. 06-10-2021 12:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Toy Soldier (Post 11101174)
The thing is though, if Man 1 would say the former as anything other than tongue-in-cheek/banter then in my experience he's only a pint and a half away from being Man 2.

Well yeah I do agree with you and besides that all these smaller little insults add up to why women are viewed as inferior on a wider scale in society imo

bots 06-10-2021 12:18 PM

it's pretty much the same as the white lives matter too argument. Well, of course no one can argue against stating the obvious, but it's used as an excuse to normalise the treatment of a persecuted group

Niamh. 06-10-2021 12:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bitontheslide (Post 11101181)
it's pretty much the same as the white lives matter too argument. Well, of course no one can argue against stating the obvious, but it's used as an excuse to normalise the treatment of a persecuted group

Yeah, it really is

user104658 06-10-2021 12:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bitontheslide (Post 11101181)
it's pretty much the same as the white lives matter too argument. Well, of course no one can argue against stating the obvious, but it's used as an excuse to normalise the treatment of a persecuted group

Well yeah it is exactly the same really

"Black lives matter" :hmph: "ALL lives matter."
"Misogyny is bad" :hmph: "ALL insults are bad."

user104658 06-10-2021 12:25 PM

I actually think misogyny is viewed differently to other forms of discrimination, bizarrely enough, because women are NOT a minority group like the other groups in siimilar discussions. Women make up 50% of the population (statistically it's often actually slightly more than 50%, for some reason) but ... that surely makes it even more bewildering that women ARE still a persecuted group. Half of the population!


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:48 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.