![]() |
Sunday mail loses appeal against meghan markle.
|
meghan must have promised the judge a good spanking
|
Yes Let it flow down the river
|
Does this mean we can forget she lied to the court, I guess it does
|
Quote:
No |
Quote:
|
Donald absolutely rinsed her on Farage last night
:joker: |
Well now she has "reshaped the Tabloid industry that conditions people to be cruel, and profits from the lies and pain they create" perhaps she can start on reshaping herself....utter hypocrisy :laugh:
|
Quote:
The whole thing has just exposed her lies and the manipulation we know she is capable of. Its a shallow win for her. |
Quote:
Goodness knows what else would be revealed if it had gone to trial…:think: AN is now considering taking the matter to the Supreme Court in the UK…. |
A pyrrhic victory
if ever was |
Quote:
A prime example.... |
I imagine they now have to get on with their long overdue front page apology to our Princess
|
When is Pinocchio going to apologise to her dwindling fanbase for all the lies she told them. :whistle:
|
Quote:
It will never happen….her reputation is damaged beyond repair. |
Deleted Post
|
there are quite a few issues with this judgement legally, i don't think it's over yet by any means
|
Quote:
No one will remember this. Everyone will remember she lied. To a court. |
Quote:
1) Most people don't know about this at all because most people don't really care about the Royal dramas, and 2) At least half of those who do know about this will have forgotten there was a court case at all in a year or two - let alone the details. Because all of it only matters to those it matters to. |
Here's another unfortunate truth about human nature;
The people who care that she lied may have something more to dislike her for - but they already didn't like her. The people who like her don't care that she lied. "The masses" that would sway, let's say, a poll on the matter will have shifted to be less in favour but --- most of them are just responding after briefly pondering the question and couldn't actually care less. We all know these things deep down. Such is tribalism, such is 2021. |
Quote:
I think you are very wrong. A lot of people have little interest in the Royal Family in general...however as individuals they can have a huge following. Diana is the greatest example...they loved her because of who she was not because she was part of the Royal Family. Likewise Meghan has created a following...but for all the wrong reasons. Unlike Diana she is hugely disliked in this country. |
Quote:
...and thats not true either. Many people liked her at the beginning.... |
Quote:
People who liked H&M before the "omg court liiiieeess" still like them. People who disliked them before have something new to crow about and still dislike them. People who didn't care before don't care now. :shrug: that's the long and short of it. |
Quote:
This is not the same scenario - the sides have already been picked and we're asking "is this something that would make people switch sides". The answer is "it's very unlikely to have made much difference at all". I know you'd like that not to be true :laugh:. |
PIERS MORGAN: Put your gloating champagne away, Princess
Pinocchio - the court of public opinion now knows you're a fork-tongued devious manipulative piece of work who only wants to protect your privacy so you can sell it https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2021/12...8466254811.jpg 'If you tell the truth,' Mark Twain once observed, 'you don't have to remember anything.' I thought of this incontrovertible truism today when news broke that Meghan Markle had 'won' her privacy court battle with the Mail on Sunday. Her victory response was issued within seconds, on regal notepaper adorned with a gold 'M' under a golden crown, and headlined: 'Statement from Meghan, The Duchess of Sussex.' Obviously everything I have drafted is with the understanding that it could be leaked,' she texted Jason Knauf, then her communications secretary, 'so I have been meticulous in my word choice, but please do let me know if anything stands out for you as a liability.' Indeed, she was so convinced the letter might be published that she even deliberately used certain words to manipulate the public's emotions when they read it. Knauf told the court: 'She also asked a specific question regarding addressing Mr Markle as 'daddy' in the letter, saying 'given I've only ever called him daddy it may make sense to open as such (despite him being less than paternal), and in the unfortunate event that it leaked it would pull at the heart-strings'.' Wow. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...Pinocchio.html |
All times are GMT. The time now is 03:55 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging (Pro) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.