![]() |
New : Blue Tick on Twitter will cost $8 a month to have
Elon Musk says $8 monthly fee for Twitter blue tick
A BBC Journalist Who joined Times Radio Said they added a blue tick to her account She will not pay $8 a month. Elon Musk says $8 monthly fee for Twitter blue tick https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-63478854 https://ichef.bbci.co.uk/news/976/cp...63c68.jpg.webp |
its a white tick?
|
Quote:
Blue Backing makes it a Blue Tick If you need one $8 a month, sent to Elon. |
If you don't pay, replies will be suppressed. Free speech though, right? :smug:
|
Good luck with that Elon :laugh2:
|
$96 a year is nothing, why would anyone whinge about that?
Bear in mind that Twitter sucks, so people who care enough about their "social standing" on that hellhole to pay even 8p a year are basically branding IDIOT on their own forehead. |
Quote:
No, just leave that Blue Tic out Those that can afford it pay the $8 a month |
New : Blue Tick on Twitter will cost $8 a month to have
No idea what on Earth you are all talking about … but if he starts charging for different things surely people will leave in their droves .
I will not be paying a dime / cent / penny Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro |
Quote:
You do not have to Pay it is easy to understand. Like there is a Twitter Professional Already there which means you can Fast Re-Tweet someone. Example https://twitter.com/OwenJones84 His account is Verified as UK Owen Jones, Left Winger (that's how I describe him) he has a Tick. So He will pay the $8 a month to keep it or the Guardian will etc |
Quote:
who you know on Twitter helps you. If you find a hellhole Unfollow those freaks. This Blur Tick regard it as a Twitter Professional extension. |
Arista is hoping to join Musk's marketing team
|
Quote:
Do not need to they have a good team. |
Elon Musk doing monetization over something that should be free.
Like a typical corporate businessman. |
Quote:
It Still is Free |
Quote:
|
So sad these celebs will now need to choose between tweeting and heating :(
|
i had to laugh at some of the arguments against it today .... "how will we know what sources to trust without the blue tick" .... like Trump was a trusted source :joker:
|
Blue ticks have always been the worst dweebs on there, but the prioritising blue tick replies has undercut his free speech bonafides instantly.
|
Quote:
He'd be better off getting rid altogether |
Quote:
|
the workforce at twitter is being slashed today, that will save a few quid
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-63495125 |
Require everyone to use their real name and verify their identity on sign-up. No need for blue ticks, no fake accounts, no bots, far less trolling.
To sign up as a company or organisation, make it that the email address has to be @ the official site. I'm not generally a fan of the idea of verified ID being required for everything but the initial idea behind Twitter was that people would use their real name and photo... it was never intended to be an anonymous trolling platform but that's what it increasingly is becoming. |
|
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 10:24 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging (Pro) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.