Quote:
|
Quote:
what now? :spin: |
Quote:
Dignity to a right winger is as foreign a concept as intelligence to them. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
And NIgel has a lovely house in Kent so that has back fired for you :smug: |
Quote:
But I'm not cosying up to anyone. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
It's embarrassing how you're gargling on their ballsacks, and for what? You'll never have what they have... Well, not that the sex trafficker has much now, but still. It's weird how you're bigging up a sex trafficker though, your kind are usually all about making out that LGBT folks are groomers and abusers and you're gassing up an actual sex trafficker. Bit weird, that. Blowing the rich will not make you rich, you can deepthroat (not that you'll have to with many of these people, SDE all around) every milquetoast right wing grifter around, you're just being a sad little drone throwing money at someone who sees you as an easy mark. Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I don't act like or think I'm anything, thanks. Making fun of the way you continuously use stock phrases isn't siding with the left or right. If anything my posts have skewed to the left. |
Quote:
I'm not using stock phrases, I'm just pointing out truths that you dislike because ultimately it goes against your true alignment. Pointing out how much this country loves being pissed on by Rupert Murdoch is just a pathetic truth of the people, not a stock phrase. Saying you skew to the left doesn't mean much if you always stand with the right. |
Quote:
|
|
Quote:
You've said the same about me plenty of times (secretly aligning with the right and trying to cover it) when it doesn't really flesh out in practice - I quite openly and clearly lean towards the "standard folks on the left" position on pretty much every topic other than gender ideology/identity politics. My stance on those things isn't informed by the right-leaning media whatsoever and is based mostly in the psychology and sociology of gender norms as a whole (and why they're BS). But having that stance on gender (apparently) makes me some sort of hateful right-wing shill who has been taken in by the lies and slander of the MSM ... even though my stance on basically every other social and economic topic skews slightly left. This idea that there needs to be a homogeny of opinion on every topic "or else" one is immediately lumped into the opposing group is just daft. Case in point really; there are, conversely, DEFINITELY some on this forum who have me categorised as a hand-wringing soft lefty liberal. |
The media will report on what sells - you're the one who taught me that LT. It's not a conspiracy, it's just clicks :hee:.
Also it's a bit daft as the Chinese spy balloon was widely reported on across the MSM and the banking collapse is all over the financial press - where anyone who finds it relevant will be reading about it. It means nothing to Joe Hick in his trailer, so it's not in his newspaper. The Airborne Toxic Event is a bit of a weird one. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
As I said in the past, I'd rather just skip the pageantry and get to the point where centrists drop their masks. |
The right is the best.
Team Right for the win. |
Quote:
I could equally say that tribally-focussed culture warriors are more concerned with image -- not self image, but their image in the eyes of the collective they've chosen to align with, and so they'' (ironically, given the left's current focus on individualism) forego anything resembling original thought in favour of toeing the palatable prescribed rhetoric of their peers. If I was "just concerned with looking good" I would slap on the blinkers and dogmatically repeat the same social justice rhetoric as everyone else instead of pointing out where I find it inaccurate and think it falls flat. I'm all for people disagreeing with that if they can do it with any sort of backing and not just an angry screech. It highlights the glaring lack of any real viable counter-point. "I know why you're wrong but I can't be bothered to evidence that, bigot!". You'd paint yourself as part of the solution with that stance ... or maybe not, maybe just go with the "Pfft, I am too jaded to concern myself with thoughts of solutions, I'm happy just making the bigots uncomfortable :smug: " ... and then accuse OTHERS of self-aggrandising pageantry for trying to have an actual discussion? Really an unfathomable lack of self awareness. |
Yes, right wing is the way forward.
The left are tied up with meaningless hogwash in their attempts at using the lgbt for their own gains. Once its over they will stop cosying up to the nazi lgbt lot. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Trying to make out that I'm tribalistic and lack self awareness is ultimately an own goal on your part. You have to keep making out that 'both sides' are beneath you to inflate your ego when in truth you identify with one side more than the other but it's all about your self-image so you delude yourself about your views to try to seem like you're operating from a neutral perspective when you aren't. At the end of the day, I know bull**** when I see it, and centrists reek of it, and they always have. It's all about them trying to impress people with a level of intellect that isn't there. Centrists are just people suffering with delusions of grandeur and main character syndrome. And transphobia is bigotry, if I was to take what you wrote before about gender and changed the words to equal terms representing race, you would be seen as a racist, what makes you think that it's not bigotry to approach gender in a similar fashion? Ego, that's what. You're also engaging in more pageantry for the right wing side by making out that any opposition to transphobia is somehow not valid and is just pageantry in itself. Because any views that oppose yours can't be valid, right? Really an unfathomable lack of self awareness. |
All times are GMT. The time now is 06:10 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.