Canada: Trans Teacher with Z-cup prosthetic breasts, returns to the classroom
 

https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2023/08...3205962251.jpg

[Kayla Lemieux,
a trans teacher with Z-cup prosthetic breasts,
returns to the classroom at a New school
after she was put on paid leave - forcing principal
to boost security

Nora Frances Henderson Secondary in Ontario,
has hired Kayla Lemieux after her previous
school put her on unpaid leave over
her prosthetic Z-cup breasts
In a memo, parents were warned the school
could soon be subjected to 'protests'
and 'disruptions'
Lemieux - who was pulled from teaching
in April - insists the breasts are natural but
has been photographed without them when
not in the classroom]

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...-building.html


Life In The City

In normal times this person would be sectioned, and have counselling, in 2023 they get a job teaching impressionable kids....progress eh?

They should run tests on the people at the new school who hired her..


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

To be fair, people aren't (and haven't ever been) sectioned unless they're a clear danger to themselves or others. I agree of course that they shouldn't be anywhere near a classroom, but we really don't want to start sectioning people without very good reasons.

[Qhey're a clear danger to themselves or others.UOTE=Soldier Boy;11323207]To be fair, people aren't (and haven't ever been) sectioned unless t I agree of course that they shouldn't be anywhere near a classroom, but we really don't want to start sectioning people without very good reasons.[/QUOTE]

you dont think this person is a danger to young impressionable people? He is clearly mentally ill, for starters he is saying these breasts are real?

Yes but like I said, I think that justifies keeping that person away from education - not physically detaining them and locking them up. Like I said, the ONLY time a mental health detention is appropriate is if the individual is a clear and present risk of harming themselves or others, i.e. physically attacking people, reckless endangerment, suicidality etc.

Other than that, if someone hasn't committed a crime we shouldn't be locking them up. Just a very, very slippery slope.

Not to mention we barely have the resources to lock up the clearly dangerous individuals let alone every oddball on the street. There are LOT of very strange people out there.

To add a little to that: I firmly believe that the best way to protect inpressionable young people from unhealthy influences is by fortifying said young people against being easily led and influenced ... rather than playing whack-a-mole with every possible worrying potential influence.

Basically - you'll never get 'em all. If you have a kid who is wide open to being influenced, eventually someone is going to influence them, no matter how hard you try. If you have a kid who is actually well educated and prepped for the sort of **** they're going to encounter in the world that's more than half the battle won before its started.

A woman wouldn't get away with working in a school looking like that, so why should he?

Lets be real this person wouldn't get near a classroom in the UK thankfully

I completely agree, but we need to start with the foundations surely and the means having teaching staff who know right from wrong, of course kids will be influenced by all different types of factors, but there are certain places we should feel that our kids have at least decent role models and in school is one of those places

When I worked in a school we had to wear tops that covered our shoulders in summer

https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2023/08...3205558986.jpg


Canada is a Crazy place.

https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2022/11...9308978340.jpg

Happy to Fly

It’s like watching a zany Keith Lemmon sketch show


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro