Find out why Charley\'s just turned down A LOT of money!
 

heatworld has just learned that Charley turned down a FIVE FIGURE sum to pose topless for a men’s magazine. The Big Brother botherer has apparently been inundated with offers to get her ladies out for the lads mags since leaving the house. “Even when they suggested to her that she could put her hand or hair in front of her boobs, she still turned it down,” our source told us. Does she not realise how many new pairs of Gucci boots she could have brought with that?


http://www.heatworld.com/img/upload/...1000017126.jpg

not silly girl its more good girl...lol!shes showing that shes not a cheap wanabee slapper shes a classy wanabee celebritY!!

:bigsmile: I like Charley in spite of her temper. However turning down a chance like that does not mke her respectable it just makes her stupid..........

Chanelle would've jumped on this oppurtunity... and she calls Charley the "slut" :laugh3:

Charley who?

I'm glad she didn't, Chanelle wouldn't miss an opportunity like that, she's so hungry of fame, Charley has her dignity for herself, she was real and honest, Chanelle is the "slut". Well done Southern London IT girl lol :cheer2:

Sam and Amanda who is more acurate then Charley who anyway........

I love how the thread has nothing to do with Chanelle, yet her names cropped up twice.

Oooh also love the stereotyping that doing glamour modelling makes you a slut.

What more do you expect from such narrowminded people:love:

Respect to Charley. 5 figures isn't that impressive: probably about 10 grand.

i'm a chanelle fan but i actually loved charley too. point is that good on charley for not feeling as if she has to strip for magazines... chanelle does as an example. but i think both are the same cos charley did stuff on bb. and anyway even if you didn't like charley you def. can't say 'charley who' as she gave lots to the show and nobody can forget about her even if they want to.

Well Chanelle called Charley a "slut" because a little bit of spit sprayed from her mouth when she was shouting (and almost everyone sprays when they're shouting or even just talking, I guess we're all dirty tramps in Chanelle's book!)... so would you say she's narrow-minded as well?

As for sunshine calling Chanelle one... he put "slut" in quotations, as if to quote Chanelle. He was using irony by calling Chanelle a "slut" over something very minor, in the exact same way that Chanelle called Charley one over something very minor, except Chanelle was actually being serious.

5 figurs she is think then

Thus far Chanelle has not appeared topless in the true sense of the word. Semi nude in a tasteful manner.

Charley is very foolosh to turn down such an oportunity for doing some harmless topless photoshoots. Topless does not translate into being a slut. Charley like most ex housemates will only have a limited shelf life. She and all the others should use it to maximum benefit.

As I said it is not as if she would be showing anything more than she has already shown......Silly girl relenting to percieved public opinion. With all her clothes on people will still dislike her for her attitude.

Charley is not "thick" for turning down a five figure sum. It could be a mere £10,000 - hardly earth shattering. I wouldn't want to degrade myself for that amount of money. Charley said she was never going to do Nuts, and respect to her. You Charley haters just find things to hate in people. If she had done it you'd call her a hypocrite. Now you're calling her thick. She can't win can she?

Chanelle has taken a shot like that though, whereas Charley still turned it down. I'm not calling Chanelle a slut btw, I do not think she is one at all, but I just think it's hilarious that she calls Charley a "slut" for spraying spit from her mouth when she's the only one of the two who has jumped on the oppurtunity to take lads mag photoshoots in exchange for money.

Nuts magazine and "tasteful" are two words which should never be used together. Vanity Fair is tasteful. Nuts is just plain trashy.

Question is, why was Chanelle brought into it at all?

:rolleyes:

think i already answered previously.. as an example.

Agree Charley is not thick just misguided. If going toplless is degrading (Which it is only in the eyes of those more prudish than others) Charley has then already "so called degraded" herself when she was in the house by having her naked boobs painted and televised. As such it is pointless turning down such work when available which will only be until interest in BB8 fades. That won't be long.

If topless is degrading what was Brian when he exposed all his privates from the rear in front of the twins live on TV shortly after entering the house. I know which I would choose as being degrading.....

I personally brought her into it because Chanelle often bitched about Charley wearing revealing clothes and even called her a slut over something so trivial as spit spraying from her mouth. I just thought that it was interesting that Chanelle said these things, but when offered money to take photoshoots for lads mags she all of a sudden forgets the morals she told everyone she had while in the House.

But do you think Chanelle is narrow-minded? I mean, you think someone is narrow-minded for calling Chanelle a "slut" for doing Nuts in exchange for money, but Chanelle called Charley one because a bit of spit sprayed from her mouth. So surely this means Chanelle is extremely narrow-minded? :bigsmile:

Of course I think Chanelle is narrow minded, and insecure. Whats your point?

However Chanelle did apologise to Charley for saying that and said it was a spare of the moment thing.

I still don't see why we continue to have this pathetic arguement involving the two, when the girls have made up themselves.

I dont dislike Charley for her thing with Chanelle anyway, I dislike her because shes a disgusting human being who I wouldnt spit on if she was on fire, BUT thats not the point.

The point of the whole thread was about how Charley turned down money, but once again people can't defend Charley because she is so undefendable so they look at the next big target and guess who it is.. Chanelle.

Even trashy mags can make a mistake sometimes and disgrace themselves by doing something tasteful. :bigsmile:
Regardless of where the pictures have originated thus far they have been in good taste

It's not about the pictures. I'm sure if Charley had done it, her pictures would look amazing and tasteful. It's just that if she has a principle of not doing Nuts shoots then she is hardly "tick" by sticking by it. Chanelle's pics out of context of the mag looked good but it's trashy when you see her pasted on the front of Nuts.