*cries*
 

He's gone :bawling:

What he did was awful, but still...he was entertaining. :sad:

I'm well upset too!
I lost my two favourites in one night!

Dennis and Sylvia!

How much crapper could it get? lol!

He was about as entertaining as a kid in a wheelchair. I'm glad the idiot is gone.

i started to like him but it was horrible what he did! i cant believe he spat in mo's face thats disgusting!

Me too, hated him, he deserved to go!

I'm devastated..

I actually am.
I was backing him so much.
and now..

I DON'T LIKE ANY OF THE OTHER GUYS
-cracks up-
=|
new banner it is..

-runs off to make a 'missing dennis' banner- =|

I take this thread back.

I just watched last night's eviction show - that was so unbelievably disgusting.

Anyone who condones spitting in someone's face is just as disgusting. He was despicable when waiting outside the DR as well.

He'll probably solely remembered for his actions - I wonder how he'd feel if everyone just spat in his face! Totally uncalled for, and vile.

pleased to hear that shaun.He was vile and what he did was just so degrading towards mohammed.No one deserves to be treat like that.How dare he spit in someone elses face,its the lowest of the low.

Can I continue to cry then?

I don't agree with what he did at all, but he WAS my favourite housemate this year, so despite anything he does, i'm going to miss him.

I liked Dennis at first but he could become quite aggressive and nasty at times and what he did to Mo was just totally out of order

He's vile.
He told a Scottish newspaper to pay him £900 and then he'd apologise. :bored:

Dirty little lowlife annoyed me so much when he done that! x

:shocked:
Thats not a nice thing to say
:shocked:

I'm so glad you guys agree. I miss Dennis so much; it's just not BB9 without him. He shouldn't have been removed. *tear*

I hate him for what he did, but loved him as a housemate.

Er... no. Dennis has already apologized numerous times for what he did. It is true, however, that he was offered 900 pounds for an exclusive interview with a magazine and would naturally not accept less than that for an interview with another newspaper (which would mean forfeiting the first offer, which was dependent upon the interview being exclusive).

Get your facts right!

Why shouldn't he have been removed? He spat in someone's face,that's against the law.

That's appeal to authority, which is a logical fallacy.

I never liked him. "puts leg behind head"

Excuse me, don't speak to me like I'm a piece of ****.
I read that on Digital Spy and so obviously that's the story placed in my mind. If its wrong, its wrong. I don't spend my time surfing news on Dennis.

So correcting your false attack on Dennis is speaking to you like you're a piece of ****? I like Dennis and what you said was untrue.

I agree. The story actually said he didn't accept the offer and got his friends to ring round tabloids to try and get even more money for his pathetic story. Which, if true, makes the story even worse and makes him very greedy indeed.

Here is the story

He didn't accept the offer because he'd already received a higher one from another magazine. If you're selling something and are offered $100 for it, then someone else comes along and offers you $50 for it, are you being greedy by selling it to the first person just to get more money?

You didn't correct it, you implied I should have known. As I said, I don't like Dennis so I'm not going to spend all my time researching him. I couldn't give a crap what he does. I just posted what I read on numerous websites.

If you like someone who spits in someones face on instinct, thats your prerogative.