Will it be worse than Cameron if Smelly Old Rachel wins on Friday?
 

vote!

No Cameron was a boring winner of a boring season, atleast Rachel was in a more interesting series haha. I think what made Cameron so boring was because he was surrounded by boring people! Rachel is a bit more deserving I reckon... But I still dont want her to win!

Your point was tarnished by the fact she chose obviously untrue schoolyard insults with "smelly old". :bigsmile:

Anyway, I loved Cameron. :love: So you've just inspired me to want Rachel to win.

You cannot get worse than Anthony in my opinion, one of my least favourite housemates ever.

Cameron was pretty bad though, but I think Rachel would be a better winner than most.

No way, Cameron was a rubbish winner, he did nothing interesting. Rachel how ever is a bubbly, funny, caring person who I wouldn't mind winning.

Anthony was a rubbish winner aswell, Makosi whould of won BB6

:joker: smelly old Rachel..

with Mo and Mikey in there too, thats an even bigger title than winning the show:laugh3:

I agree completely with Callum, Rachel would be a great winner because of those things, and she's not old or smelly, well not sure about smelly cos i cant smell her, but she's deffo not old

Best series ever ruined by a shite winner. :sad:

I'd like her to win. I loved her, hated her, loved her, hated her but now I love her. :bouncy:

If Michael And Rachel Are In The Final Remind Me To Put My Fist Through My Tv Screen................

Nope, she'll be a worthy winner imo. More so than Sara (who has already scooped 25 grand)

just in case I forget, heres my reminder now and no cheating by wearing rubber gloves ok:whistle:

Actually to be fair... Cameron did alot in his series, I mean he went to Africa half way through the season then came back... and when he came back he was actually really funny and had changed a bit.

Atleast Cameron changed for the better, Rachel has been level throughout the whole thing, doing nothing amazing... she has just been ok. I dont get the big crowd behind her to win as she hasnt had one storyline whilst being in there... just the fact she is overly sweet and cheering at everything... and obviously with her trying to be stupid every now and again.

"Smelly"? Do you know something we don't? :whistle:

:joker: within the space of a sentance you go from not one storyline, but two, have you ever seen the scene from Life of Brian..."what have the Romans ever done for us" ? :joker:

Nobody has been an individual entertainment the concept of the show is the entertainment which Rachel has like all of them contributed to.
You can ask the same question of them all what act have they produced individually to entertain, was Dale(a random example only) an entertainer?

I'll believe this when I see a contestant on Britains got talent walk on stage and announce his "act" to Simon Cowell

"well I'm going to like chat my girl up like then cuddle her like then maybe say something sweet like...like I really like you"

next............:shrug:

Was Cameron BB4 winner?

Rachel is not as bad as people are making out!

RACHEL TO WIN!

With you on that one Lauren :thumbs:

Didnt vote in the poll, Cameron is the most boring housemate to ever win, he totally didn't deserve it

If he is what you say, then he wouldn't of won. Majority rules, majority wanted him to win - end of surely? :wink:

Oh come on, its the british public that voted, thats saying something, he was totally 100% boring

Cameron was very boring... its just that the people he was up with were even more boring. Plus he got the great luck of being BB's fave and they sent him off to africa and got his odds up greatly... although then again, big brother never chose him it was just luck.

It was clear whoever got sent to Africa would win, as it was a rubbish series and the only one to do something exciting would win.

And you are part of the British public too.

we have had some really unworthy winners... this would just be an addition to that list