Why Rachel is a Ridiculous Winner
 

Check out the vid below and see why she is not a patch on this winner.

LOVE KATE!


:love:

Kate Lawler is the best winner ever. Fact.

I love Kate. She is brilliant. :banana:

The illogical thing about this thread though, is that you Ukturtle were supporting SARA to win! That would have been beyond stupid and ridiculous, had it happened.

Rachel on the other hand is a deserving winner. So comparing her to Kate (in your feeble way of posting a youtube clip as an argument) is just putting two good winners beside each other - and your point of Rachel's triumph being "ridiculous" is not even close to being made.

Everyone has their own qualities people like, just because it's not the same for you.

Get over it, she won.

kate was soooo much more of a winner then rachel

Rachel is nice, I don't hat her, but she did hardly anything to entertain me in BB9, the reason I watch is for entertainment. The other 4 finalists all deserved to win more in my opinion because they all did stuff which is entertaining.

If Rachel had not won, she would be forgotten about as there was no one major event you can place her in, except the cake task.

OK so youre basing it on what you found entertaining - and the majority out-voted you because they thought Rachel was the most entertaining/deserving.

Not many people understand why you found Sara entertaining.

I only saw a lot of dancing and talking in the diary room as well as talking to people. I didn't watch BB3, but by the looks of her best bits, they didn't look all that great to me, sorry

Kate was alot like Rachel, just a nice girl who hung around in the background and had a bit of fun when the time was right. Not much difference between them at all.

Get over it she won. Just because you did not found her entertaining does not mean the public felt the same way has you. Its the same with sara you found her entertaining but the public didn't so just get over it.

Rachel shouldn't of won...

Kate Lawler is hands down the best winner of all time

Calm down.... :rolleyes:

oooooook

I think that its someones time of the month...


LOL

I really would compare Rachel to Kate, but apparently in BB9 being a Kate/Rachel wouldn't win you a series.

By the precedent set by Anthony, Brian, etc., you'd need to be a complete dumbass who would expose themselves and get shamelessly drunk while showing 0 class throughout the entire series.

*sigh* Some people's ideas of a "winner"

All the winners have deserved it more than Rachel did this year.

She shouldn't hae one, she didn't change from the minute she went in there to the minute she came out, she has always been, and will always be the same boring housemates.

Rex, Mickey, Darnell and Sarah were all quality entertainment, and should've come 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th in that order.

i am :tongue:

Sorry, I've yet to understand your argument.

If you're trying to argue that she hasn't changed, then that adds a plus to her consistency. She obviously didn't go in trying to be someone she was not, and her "act" (which everyone thinks :rolleyes:) never wore away.

If you're trying to argue that she's boring, well different strokes for different folks. I'd honestly like to see someone that's positive all the time than a bully who makes watching BB feel uncomfortable.

No Sorry, Rachel is definately the most deserving winner.

it wasn't the MAJORITY of the population, it was just over half!

FACT! Where was she in the BB9 highlights!? NOWHERE! Will she ever get work on TV?! BIG FAT NOOOOOOOO

Kate Lawler was ok if you find drunk women entertaining. Rachel won for completely different reasons: For standing up to the odious teat-head, for taking the grossest of constant insults with dignity, for being unfailingly helpful towards Mikey and for being completely nice.

Rachel has NO best bits.