Quote:
Originally Posted by kirklancaster
I am a bit confused, Withano about what you mean.
What I am saying is that; Did what Robinson was actually doing constitute a 'Breach of The Peace'?
If so, how did it?
Was he violently shouting? Vocally inciting others to violent acts? Causing an affray? Disrupting pedestrians/motorists? Forcibly preventing others from going about their legitimate business?
What I am saying, is that in my opinion, the charge against Robinson was a convenience - one which removed him from THAT particular location and stopped him filming and broadcasting THOSE particular events.
What I am further saying - in my opinion - is that his arrest is part of the Authorities policy of suppressing any news of these trials because of P.C. pressure.
You know, Withano - the very same Authorities who TOLERATED a stream of repeated UNLAWFUL acts by Islamic Extremist 'Hate Preachers' from Anjem Choudary to Abu Hamza - for the LONGEST time.
|
Well, if the livestream wasn't suspiciously deleted, you could have seen for yourself.
It was, in every way imaginable, contempt of court. 'Breaching the peace' is a bit meaningless to me, but I suppose if hundreds of people came to the court as a result of his livestream, then sure.
If you break the law, Kirk, this is what happens. It isn't exclusive to Tommy Robinson.
I don't think this has much to do with political correctness, unless you're willing to state that the majority of the country want some chavvy criminal vigilante and an angry mob dealing with sensitive issues. People not wanting him around is just popular opinion, not 'PC gone mad'