Quote:
Originally Posted by Withano
Livia. You havent watched the information. Literally the only piece of information. You havent seen it.
You attempted to state that your opinion on the case was more worthwhile because you are a lawyer with four years of education. It isnt. You havent seen the information. You are not more in-the-know based on your education. It wont be true when the next law-based thread comes along either - if youre not going to watch the information provided, your opinion on the information will mean less despite of your education.
What youre doing is equal to ‘hi guys, i dont know much about grenfell tower, but im a trained fire marshall. It was a hairdryer’ his opinion means less than those who educated themselves on the disaster.
|
Re the bold bit... I can honestly say I know more about the law than you do, and about the difference between contempt of court and breaching the peace.
You came up with a clear cut case of contempt of court after seeing a bit of film on the Internet.
You didn't say it was your opinion, you said it was a clear cut case. And it was not.