Quote:
Originally Posted by Withano
It shouldnt matter too much either way, but if somebody wants to identify as literally anything, then why would we take their comfort away from them?
|
I agree with that in principle but only in the sense that people can
personally identify as whatever they want to identify and perhaps at most have an expectation that their nearest and dearest will take the time to understand the intricacies of that.
The problems are not with how someone wants to live their personal life, though, the problem lies in there being an expectation that
everyone else / the whole world en masse must both a) accept the existence of and definition of every descriptor, and keep up to date with every new descriptor as it comes into usage, even if it is not an area that has any bearing at all on their day to day life and also b) accurately remember the personally chosen identities of every single person they ever encounter, with a failure to do so being "offensive".
Or in other words... Yes, it's fine for any individual to live how that individual wants to, so long as they remember that
other people are not just actors on their own personal stage and beyond not being
deliberately aggressive or offensive, they must manage and limit their expectations of people.
Expecting a layperson to understand and be supportive of pansexuality when a brief bit of googling demonstrates that there isn't even concensus amongst pansexuals on what pansexuality actually is... For example. I mean, you're pretty adamant about your definition of it Withano, but googling immediately brings up several aspects of your description under the heading "myths about pansexuality!", in articles written by self identified pansexuals, so...