Quote:
Originally Posted by poppsywoppsy
If no one can speak to him on these issues, your point is just conjecture.
He has had many laughs and carries himself well at these times.
You are putting him down through your perceived opinion of what might happen, not what has actually occurred.
|
I'm not putting him down, I'm analysing his character in a social situation because he's on a show that has been
about analysing characters in social situations since the day it was conceptualised. I don't think he's a bad person, I certainly don't think he's "evil" or "scum" or any of the other stuff that's been thrown around about him, but I do know (for a fact, because he's said it) that he considers certain types of conversation and interaction to be inherently "better" than others which I find naive, and he has frequently shown that he struggles to keep his emotions balanced, and those things combined (in my opinion) show a lack of the intellectual maturity and emotional stability that's required to properly engage in a balanced discussion of the things he wants to talk about.
Being blunt I find it highly unlikely that he could continue an interaction on these topics
with someone who doesn't agree with what he's saying for very long without becoming frustrated or angry. I think he assumes that a different perspective = "people who just don't get it". And that's not a conversation.
I would add that the reason I'm pretty confident about these things is that
I've been there. I lived there for years
...
.