Quote:
Originally Posted by Toy Soldier
I'm sure I know what I'm saying better than you do, 2S 
I'm saying that people were definitely wrong when they insisted that Saville's accusers were lying for money, so they surely should consider that they may be wrong again in saying the same about Jackson's accusers. |
And I could say that people were
definitely right when they insisted that Richards's accusers were lying for money, so they surely should consider that they
may be right again in saying the same about Jackson's accusers.
You see we can play that game both ways.
So it doesn't help you going to a different thread and jumping at people. These are different cases, full stop, and should be treated separately and independently.