View Single Post
Old 24-03-2019, 11:55 AM #158
Vicky. Vicky. is offline
0_o
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 65,044


Vicky. Vicky. is offline
0_o
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 65,044


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Niamh. View Post
This is a good article too

https://laidbareblog.blogspot.com/20...canns.html?m=1

Sent from my SM-G920F using Tapatalk
Quote:
Kate was worried enough to keep checking the kids, but not motivated enough to take them to hospital, raise the alarm, or ask any of her equally qualified colleagues to examine them.

From that, I conclude that they were drugged, but not by a stranger

Despite their claims, there is no record that they made an officer aware of their suspicions.

From that, I conclude that if they were drugged, it was not by a stranger.

No record exists of them telling the police in any interview about their suspicions.

From that, I conclude that they deliberately withheld this information. That does not indicate a stranger

No testing was done until such time had passed that no interpretation of the results could be precise. The motive for testing at all was to return a negative result for Kate.

In conclusion, I can find no earthly reason why any parent believing they have two infants who have been sedated by a stranger would fail to seek help, tell the police and have them tested.

I can find many reasons why they might fail to do the above if they were responsible for the sedating, though.
Spot on.
Vicky. is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote