View Single Post
Old 04-04-2005, 03:03 PM #12
bananarama's Avatar
bananarama bananarama is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: West Midlands
Posts: 7,438


bananarama bananarama is offline
Senior Member
bananarama's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: West Midlands
Posts: 7,438


Default

Quote:
Originally posted by vicky
I agree bananarama it's fairer to have one vote per person and stop multiple voting but it's all about making as much money as possible so it will never happen.

I agree it is about money and may never happen. However based on my own attitude to voting I think the multiple vote ability deters people from wasting a vote because they think multiple voting by BB addicts will undo any influence a single voter has. In my case last year because I heard of so many throwing money down the drain to manipulate unfairly the outcome I therfore hardly voted at all. Twice if i remember correctly.

Who knows there may be many others like me who are put off voting and as such the channel looses money...

Also allowing the rule one vote per day would be a compromise on multiple voting and if that rule were well advertised might encourage more people to do just that. They would not be spending a fortune after all...Just a theory.....
bananarama is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote