Quote:
Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet
hang on you were happy to listen to a single hearsay article in the failing independent yesterday to attack Trump about a personal family matter and now today you want "extra" video evidence ?
The nasty vile lady in question quit her job in disgrace - i take it that is now sufficient for you?
|
Let me explain the obvious differences between them to you.
Firstly, you don't know how many articles I read, I tend to check stories that I read from multiple angles just to make sure it's correct. Facts are important to me and the facts of that story is that the government is cutting legal aid and education efforts to migrant children, something they are entitled to receiving due to the Flores Agreement.
As for the 'family matter' that's just my opinion and I liked the idea of Melania's quiet rebellions, not that they were factual. Judging from the facts we do know (Melania didn't move into the White House quite a while after Trump's inauguration) as well as actual footage of Melania visibly being displeased with Trump. I made my own opinion. I didn't take the article as gospel, I made up my own mind considering the facts I knew.
Of course I want footage because we lack context as to how the incident started and the right keep making a point of creating these videos without showing off a vital part of the story that would vindicate them of any kind of claims of spin or baiting which is how these incidents begin. Context is important, as proven by me providing you with the context that unravels your argument that I am somehow being hypocritical despite the contexts of your examples being different to this story.
Context is a wonderful thing, embrace it and you can't go wrong.