Quote:
Originally Posted by Toy Soldier
I didn't say it was the "only" personality trait, you've injected that in there yourself Ammi, I said "the cornerstone of their identity and personality" ... if you're going to use quotation marks, you should actually quote what was said, as to not be misrepresentative - I'm sure you know that.
I was basing this comment on the OP where Vicky suggested that it was important to someone else that "she correctly define herself", something which should matter to no one but the individual in any way at all, unless they consider this definition to be a cornerstone of identity and thus important on a broader social scale. Did it go there fast? Yes... because it's what the whole thread is about. Also, the thread is about sexual orientation NOT gender identity and thus it is entirely "about sexy time" ... what else could it possibly be about? I suspect the waters between sexual orientation and gender identity are being muddied here where there is no need for them to be, and again it seems to come down to the confusion in the distinction between sex and gender. Physical sexual attraction, and thus sexual orientation, has nothing to do with gender identity for anyone other than the individual.
|
...I’ve made a decision to not read the 2nd paragraph of your post, TS...which is a shame really because I’ve always been interested in your thoughts on many subjects...and this is one of the reasons why these debates are how they often are, in my humble opinion...because of ‘misrepresentation’ and that misrepresentation is toward me and my comments and not the other way around....I didn’t quote your post but if you read back through the thread, you will see those words were used, which is why they’re correctly stated as I have quoted them...you’ve attached them to your own post, not I....
...I’ll accept your apology when you’re prepared to give it...