View Single Post
Old 20-02-2021, 09:12 PM #596
Tom4784 Tom4784 is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 45,095
Tom4784 Tom4784 is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 45,095
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jet View Post
What I wrote wasn't idle gossip though. Most of it IS verified -
Harry DID say in a radio interview “We will be the family she never had”. It could be on Utube?

That Meghan refused the Palace Aides help to go to Mexico to help her father cope with press intrusion. That was revealed by Palace sources and is verified in their friend Omid’s bio.

Meghans father did work his butt off for her - from Meghan’s own mouth and in her blog before she met Harry.

They WERE invited to her first wedding, so they were good enough to be seen then, but not in public for her marriage to Harry. They were not invited to her marriage to Harry, they were seen not to be there, but lots of celebs were, as seen.

The only point not completely verified is that she froze out her family and some friends after finding fame in Suits, that came from separate accounts from independent friends of hers. I read their accounts and it all rings true to me given her other behavior.

How do you know her father and sister profited that much? It was often said that 'Mr. Markle has received no payment for this article' and the same for Sam's interviews. Did you see the cheques?
That's a whole lot of assumptions, overemphasising and picking and choosing. There's also no justification for selling out their family to the press, in fact your attempts to vindicate them by making out they didn't get paid only makes them look like bigger ******** because that means they attacked their daughter/sister when she was about to get married out of pure spite and vindictiveness.

Are you going to make out that they didn't do it for profit and instead they just did it to cause harm to someone and dampen their day? Are you really going to defend such behaviour after going to lengths to establish that it wasn't need nor greed, that motivated them, but pure viciousness?

Also you keep making out that they aren't profiting from Meghan but did you not say you read Samantha Markle's book? That she had a part 2 in the works? So if what you say is true, she lashed out at Meghan just for the sake of being malicious and then she profited from a book deal.... and you're desperately trying to spin things to make them the victims here? Warped.
Tom4784 is offline