Quote:
Originally Posted by Niamh.
I mean, yes it's one side of the story and everything they say could be truth or half truths or lies, we could sit here and argue all day about it however for me the proof of how shabbily Meghan was treated by the press is all there in black and white (pardon the pun) Did anyone ever come out and defend her when she's getting bullied to **** by the papers? That alone tells me her story holds some water  |
Yes.
It was also the programme they agreed to in order to present their side of their decision and why they made it.
It is clear on the vile headlines of the press and the comparisons of her with Kate.
That their claims against the press are justified.
As a court has just so ruled.
Only they know the full Royal set up of the institution they highlighted and how bad it became for them.
Of course the Palace won't accept that account, it's all shrouded in mystery.
I was only 5 when Princess Diana died, however it seems to me, the same dark, sinister and cold institution it was when she was in the Royal machinery.
Hasn't altered at all.
Nothing changed, nothing learned or dealt with.
So I too can support the view they were genuine in this interview.
I see no reason for them not to be.
After all they walked off once it reached for them a more dangerous level.
Plus it was a fully born and bred Royal too who forcefully was presenting and confirming what Meghan had indicated.
Namely Prince Harry himself.
He lived through the trauma of his Mother's death as a child, he must feel traumatised that he was then witnessing his chosen wife, heading into danger as his Mother did.
It's staggering to think the Palace wouldn't have made sure that could never have been the case.