[Ammi]

….she was giving a view that aligned with many other SAGE views, so the question had no relevance at all other than to try to be sensationalist in some way and to ‘create a moment’ and it was clumsy…..if she had just given him some kind of extreme views that didn’t align with her colleagues then the question would have been valid but it wasn’t and she effortlessly made him look a bit silly for asking it…it just feels like another ‘quest for outrage’ rather than seeking informative facts from a guest on the show….and over something as important as people’s lives ….he wouldn’t have backed off with his ‘fair answer’ had he had any type of point but he really didn’t, based on what she was saying and what she was saying showed her in the process of displaying to him that her policy had no bearing on her job credentials….


….what a silly man he it’s and his silliness does seem to be impacting his work, though, in contrast….