[joeysteele]

As was pointed out on Question Time last night.
The Supreme Court didn't rule on whether she should lose her British citizenship.

It ruled only that the government was legal in deciding to remove it.

It leaves therefore as Kate Green of Labour was pressed, even by the audience, although the government were legal to do so.
However was the government wrong to remove her citizenship.

Kate Green was criticised for not opposing the government and to say they were wrong.

It's like it was legal for the government to say bring in the bedroom tax which causes many to lose their homes or be moved on.
However it wasn't right to do it.
Despite being legal.

What the court was saying.
If the government decided to leave her British citizenship in place or decide to remove it.
They, the government, not the Court, had the legal right to make that decision.

Whether it's right or wrong is another matter.
We've had many bad things done in the name of being legal.

If she were to return, no one is saying she should walk around free.
As the overall view on Question Time, from panel,( except the Con Minister and I think one of the audience who spoke), she should be allowed back to face the accusations and charges, held until gone through the Courts, then whatever sentence imposed, having to be carried out.

If any, even small, valuable information can in fact be collated from her as to how the terrorist network grooms and works.
Then I think that preferable.

I have no time for her myself.
However, as she is, yes in a camp, she is never going to have to face any justice procedure anywhere.