Quote:
Originally Posted by bitontheslide
Keir doesn't need to implement anything so the vote was quite meaningless. All it did was expose the divisions there are in the party. People can call it democracy, but all it does is create a bad impression. This conference has been a complete disaster for labour, and I will guarantee that the Tory conference next week will present a united front, whether the members agree or not. Perception is everything. Will the public vote for a rabble that cant agree on anything or a party with a plan. It's a no brainer
|
There's divisions in all Parties, the only difference is Labour's aren't hidden.
If they were of course we'd be called being deceitful.
All through it's history Labour has been in conflict with its differing wings.
George Brown was a thorn in the side of Harold Wilson apparently.
He was his Deputy PM even all that time ago in the 60s.
Somehow eventually they do and can come together.
It takes however a strong sort of leader.
Even Kinnock has his conflicts with a lot in his party.
Corbyn couldn't unite and neither is Starmer.
We've the wrong leader.
Then again I think all Parties except for the SNP have the wrong leader anyhow.