|
-
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 36,685
|
|
|
-
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 36,685
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by AnnieK
So the professional who has seen all the evidence months after it was collected and agrees with your train of thought is credible but the professional who worked the case as it happened isn't credible and could believe in God? Riiigghht  |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Niamh.
Seems about right.....
|
"McHoskey (1995) found that conspiracy beliefs may be in part a product of biased assimilation—accepting information that confirms one’s views and scrutinizing information that disconfirms one’s views (see also Thorson, 2015)."
|