View Single Post
Old 13-02-2008, 09:14 AM #8
Mrluvaluva's Avatar
Mrluvaluva Mrluvaluva is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 23,113


Mrluvaluva Mrluvaluva is offline
Senior Member
Mrluvaluva's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 23,113


Default

It's about time! People like Britney or Amy cannot step outside their homes without being photographed. Just going to the local store is impossible. On days when there is nothing to report on Amy Winehouse (which is very rare), they will photograph her buying stuff from a shop. Is that news? Do we need to know about that? No we don't, but the publics obsession with celeb, creates a market for this trash. If we didn't buy the magazines and papers that parade these photos, then maybe this would be a step forward too in erradicating this kind of behaviour.

Companies pay vast amounts of money for photos of celebes like Britney also. If they followed in the footsteps of Holy Moly, then the demand would not be so great, and the prices of pictures of this nature would come tumbling down, creating less interest.

They are also talking about bringing in a new law where the paps are not allowed to get up close and in their faces. (I think Kiz did a thread on this also). This is another way of moving forward too. What will it take before something is done? Will someone die in an accident? Will someone be driven to suicide?

Something needs doing and it needs doing now.
Mrluvaluva is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote