Quote:
Originally Posted by Toy Soldier
No one said otherwise and no one is in any doubts that it's the Republican/right/(church) elements of US politics who want this to be the case, it also (as always) has nothing to do with the strawman of "trans people not existing". It's about the openness and willingness to discuss issues affecting women without caveats and constraints and that is (without question) being eroded.
|
There is complete openness when it comes to discussing issues affecting women; at least 5 judges in this story have had that debate and acted on their opinions and I'm pretty sure all 5 of those judges would align with the tibb majority when it comes to issues around gender. This action is purely about an outdated constitution and ideology, nothing else.
It's boogeymanning gender as a scary future wedge, when the actual reality of what is happening in real time is clear and obvious.