Quote:
Originally Posted by parmnion
Wouldn't it make more sense to assume it was the carers of the elderly transferring covid onto them, rather than other elderly people that's come back from hospital?
|
No.
The Care Homes could not refuse to take them back
Plus they weren't told the elderly returning to the homes has not been tested for covid on discharge from the hospitals
Furthermore despite Hancock's constant assurances that PPE equipment would be with Hospitals and care homes in days.
There was NONE.
Plus none got for a period further of weeks.
Then when he did get some, most of it was unusable.
The Care homes were looking after very well their residents.
Visits were stopped.
Stringent rules in place.
Then the government via Johnson and Hancock enacted the policy to free up beds in hospitals that the elderly be rushed out and back to Care homes.
Without even being tested for covid.
That policy I repeat again, was judged to have been unlawful in Court.
Not the Care Homes, the Government policy.
Now it will be for the full public independent inquiry to dig deeper and gather ALL the evidence from the avoidable deaths in Care homes groups.
I don't think myself I'd like to be Johnson or Hancock when they see that evidence and make their conclusions.
Then we'll see what those 2 creeps really were like.
Although I doubt to some no matter what they did.
They'd still defend them over the families of lost loved ones whose loved ones SHOULD have been 100% safe in Care Homes.
As Hancock insisted they were but he was blatantly lying and being only deceitful.
The Court has ruled that policy unlawful.
Trying to shift the blame on care Home staff of whom some also contracted covid from the elderly being rushed out and back to them.
Is a pretty low move.
They HAD to take their residents back.
They couldn't leave them on the streets???