| 
				
				 - 
				
				
			 | 
			  | 
			
				
					Join Date: Jul 2013 
					
					
					
						Posts: 36,685
					 
					
					
					
					
					     
				 
			 | 
		 
		 
		
	 | 
	| 
			
			 - 
			
			
			
			
				 
				Join Date: Jul 2013 
				
				
				
					Posts: 36,685
				 
				
				
				
				
				     
			 
	 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			
			 
			
		
		
		
			
			You can also, by the way, absolutely argue that it's a net negative for linguistic function that the word has had it's definition blurred, and you can argue that this supplementary definition arose through a disrespect for the original definition. Definitely a valid standpoint - but still doesn't change the fact that it's a correct supplementary dictionary definition.
		 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	 |