-
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 36,685
|
|
-
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 36,685
|
You can also, by the way, absolutely argue that it's a net negative for linguistic function that the word has had it's definition blurred, and you can argue that this supplementary definition arose through a disrespect for the original definition. Definitely a valid standpoint - but still doesn't change the fact that it's a correct supplementary dictionary definition.
|