Quote:
Originally Posted by GoldHeart
Charles was besties with Savile aswell. It looked like Savile had him in his pocket.
|
Yes he was a favourite of the Royals too.
He did though have leading Cons and Thatcher firmly in his camp.
He should have been prosecuted, however Starmer was not one of the investigative lawyers.
He could only act on what was presented.
Which wasn't enough to prosecute.
He stated after all the revelations,which flooded in more after Saville's death, that changes to prosecutions of this nature would be strengthened.
I am no fan of Starmer, however whoever, police, detectives and lawyers who worked on the Saville allegations while he was alive.
It appears didn't present enough to prosecute.
So he'd have to stick to only what was said in the documents presented.
Were the lawyers and even the police leaned on?
Who knows.
Saville was evil.
He had strong influential friends in high places, such as in the Con government and in Thatcher.
As you stated Charles too.
Being fair to them, were they all fooled by him too?
Because he was clearly one vile, evil devious individual.
Even to having hospitals trust him and give him keys to hospital wards.
I say again though.
The Knighthood FOUGHT for him by Thatcher, how many more doors to vulnerable victims did that help open up for him.