Quote:
Originally Posted by Soldier Boy
I haven't played the game as it's not actually out yet - I imagine that similarly to Cyberpunk and BG3 (where you could have a willy on your female character if you wanted) and Hogwarts Legacy (where your male wizard could live in the witch dorm if you wanted) it probably doesn't affect the game at all beyond the character creation screen, and if he just cracked on and made himself a burly male character, he would indeed get to role-play as a burly male character so I agree his response is over the top -- but his response is what it is.
I disagree that it never has an effect on the quality of the media itself and would say that when it's done in a clearly agenda-driven way and doesn't feel naturally part of the media being presented, it does simply make for bad material. Netflix is especially guilty of that at times.
This isn't exactly cancel culture though, cancel culture would be people saying "boycott this/don't watch this, for [reasons]" - it's not the same as people being genuinely put off of things because of a change in content. Disney being the prime example of this right now. Netflix is another. It's also not about celebrating, bemoaning or being indifferent to it - it exists, that much is clear. The dropping revenue is clear. I'm just observing in that sense. For example, I am of course TiBB's biggest feminist but that doesn't mean that I don't recognise that "clear efforts" (what I would call shoehorning) of feminist concepts into things where the audience isn't going to be receptive is going to result in a financial flop. Conversely, the feminist concepts in "Barbie" for example have contributed to it being an absolute box-office runaway smash hit.
These companies do (or should) know their audience and trying to introduce elements that their own audiences don't want in everything is rightly or wrongly in moral terms absolutely tanking the entertainment industry at the moment.
My personal thoughts are that there's a way to be inclusive that's more naturally story-driven and less overtly political, and that makes for ... well ... things that are just more engaging and fun to watch.
NO ONE is going to watch something just because it's inclusive, is worth remembering. Even the people it's trying to include are going to tune out when it starts to affect quality. That's just the facts.
|
You don't think bud light was cancel culture? Just the phrase go woke, go broke more than gives the cancel culture game away. Do what we like, or we'll hurt you financially. It's a threat. I don't actually have a problem with that, because it's the capitalist system we live in, so I'm actually all for people voting with their wallets/feet/eyes.
I don't think offering choice is a bad thing, and TV companies will ultimately reign themselves in, because at the end of the day they value profits more than people. i think where we may disagree, is the fact that pandering has always happened for all groups, but only now has it become a problem. That's what I don't understand.
Action films are geared towards dudes, and rom coms are aimed at women. Obviously that's an oversimplification as I'm sure people from both groups cross, but I'm just pointing out that this has always happened, but unfortunately these programmes/films have been made political by the people protesting/crying about them by waging campaigns, they're not inherently political because they've been made.