|
MVGGA
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: with joeysteele.
Posts: 56,541
Favourites (more):
BBCanada 9: Rohan Strictly 2020: Bill Bailey
|
|
MVGGA
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: with joeysteele.
Posts: 56,541
Favourites (more):
BBCanada 9: Rohan Strictly 2020: Bill Bailey
|
Have you guys seen the picture of Rogue for the revival of X-Men 92?
For some reason I can't link very well on my Tablet.
Just go to Twitter and you'll see the picture that I saw.
Now don't get me wrong I understand that it's a kids Show, so obviously sexualized characters shouldn't really be that prominent in the Show, especially for a 27 year old, that is more than fair.
But where the Californian mindset does lose me, is why can't she at least look feminine? Why does Hollywood have an issue with any of their Animated/Video Game characters looking feminine? What kind of mental illness should we even call it?
Because there's two things that Hollywood needs to get into their braincells.
1. Women can be less sexualized and still look feminine, there are unattractive women in this world that don't look like a product of incest, or been experimented on in a Lab.
2. Women can be a feminist icon whilst still being attractive, something that these weird Hollywood people just don't seem to understand. That's not just about X-Men 97, this goes for a lot of works in Animation and Video Games.
__________________
|