Quote:
Originally Posted by Ammi
…I agree to an extent but I also think it’s inevitable that these speculations are going to happen in a social media world we live in…because Charles has been photographed whereas Kate hasn’t….I’m only stating what I’m reading, and the reasoning of it, not my own thoughts…but I can understand how this is ‘gaining legs’ also…
|
Charles is the top Royal though he has a duty to show his face, I dont think Kate has any obligation to do so especially as the Palace said she would not be back on public facing duties until 31st March, as BOTs says if she doesn't appear after that something is seriously amiss, Kate has the extra pressure of having her looks scrutinised to the nth degree, something Charles doesn't really have to worry about
__________________
'put a bit of lippy on and run a brush through your hair, we are alcoholics, not savages'
Quote:
Originally Posted by Beso
Livelier than Izaaz, and hes got 2 feet.
|