Quote:
Originally Posted by GoldHeart
I see both their points, but I agreed more with Segun when he said if you go too far one way or another it can be .. destructive.
But I think both Daze & Nathan have tunnel vision on topics.
I don't think Nathan will ever truly understand the issues people face .....classism ,poverty & healthcare problems.
But on the other hand I don't think Daze will ever admit or see that activism ... especially where climate change is concerned ,has become an attention seeking embarrassment.
During their debate Lily was like a little child in a classroom watching 2 teachers argue,her head just kept turning back & forth like a tennis match  . As she looks confused & puzzled. |
In my opinion, this sums up the whole situation and those involved effectively.
I agree to some extent with the views of both, but at the same time, I disagree with some of their thinking, and that’s because these issues are so much more complex than either suggested. I agree with both you and Segun about the dangers of extreme and close-minded thinking.
I think Nathan expressed his points more calmly and respectfully, and he seemed able to think them through in a more-considered way. Daze, in contrast, seemed to respond more impulsively, and in my view, made sweeping and well-rehearsed statements. She didn’t offer solutions, or address the complexities he raised.
I’m beginning to see different aspects of Nathan’s character in tonight’s show and in the Live Stream. Much to my surprise, I’m finding myself liking him more as time goes on, and I can see his value as a housemate.