View Single Post
Old 13-05-2025, 04:28 PM #18
user104658 user104658 is offline
-
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 36,685
user104658 user104658 is offline
-
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 36,685
Default

A small deep dive reveals that they would save a LOT more energy (and thus cut carbon far more) by concentrating on converting current lighting to newer/most energy efficient versions than they'll save by turning some off. But of course, the time/money to do that is a lot more. It does feel slightly like a "quick, cheap and overly simple" solution.
user104658 is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote