Quote:
Originally Posted by Beso
You are soulless Mock. Devoid of any real feeelings of love or emotion..I think that's all down masturbation and the self loathing you will feel afterwards.
As for kids and this thread being less of an impact on them than a video of a fight then i strongly disagree on that.
Kids will see fights at school, fights between friends in the street, blood on TV, but the government has added an age restriction on porn for the very reason that most of what you describe can be found on the internet...Kids of 13 do not need to know about this sort of stuff..
You are wrong for mak8ng the thread, but more importantly the mods are wrong for allowing it..especially the ones with kids and grandkids..
"Mum/dad/granny/papa....what was going 9n on the forum today"
Oh we had a right good chat about eating **** as we masterbate" n9w please excuse me, someone dared to say Edward scissor trans, and I need to go and deal with it and them very sternly.
|
I am not soulless, and there is a reason why everyone hates Starmer's policy btw so the age verification argument is not a good defense.
And I have no real issue with the threads showing the violence, but going by your logic (which seems to be the same as the very unpopular opinion that Starmer has on this topic) is that it's more healthy for kids to see people getting physically attacked rather than them seeing a few words that you don't happen to like.
And what makes your backwards logic worse, is that you're acting self-righteous about it, just because you personally prefer to see people hitting each other over a few words that you don't like.
And now I'm soulless apparently for saying that imagery of violence is worse than a description about a fetish that 90% of the population finds disgusting.
Only in 2025.
__________________
Jimmy Floyd Hasselbaink and River Song as my Strictly 2025 Sweepstakes, and eventual winner and runner-up of the series.