[Mystic Mock]

Originally Posted by Maru

I don't see that happening for a number of reasons, much of which isn't even relevant atm. But especially now, as people are starting to become more self-aware about their own politics and are testing boundaries, some boundaries that the government and other individuals out in the wild seem very passionate about using as a justification to strip other's rights.

In the UK I understand the political environment is very different. But for us, it's considered a fundamental natural right and the most natural mandate as a citizen is very more closely tied to the means to self-defense. I would even guess it's a non-negotiable for much larger portions of the country than not.

We can talk about what restrictions and laws might come into play to help mitigate disaster (a different discussion), but an outright ban at this point isn't remotely conceivable. Especially as political violence is increasing. The whole point of 2A is exactly for politically dire situations like this where govt or agencies may use any context to repress or interfere with the individual rights of its citizens. Without making this post much longer, it's foundational to the formation of America.

You do make strong points tbh.