[farhad]

To me that doesn't mean anything. The roots of the theory could have influenced him. But if by your logic if something big comes about from a big public figure then that could be easily turned around onto another religion. Take the 10 commandments for example. Now adapt them into every day British law, and adapt them into our moral laws too. Just because something comes about from a religious scripture it does not mean the scripture is true.

http://www.muslimheritage.com/topics...&ArticleID=383

If you try looking at the link, the man who came with the theory first was Al-kindi in the 9ths century, he got the idea from the quran and he used that theory to prove the existence of God much like Einstein did at the end of his career.

• Forced conversation is forbidden. Although it states physical conversation, in some way this could be interpreted as physical conversation because obviously the Qur'an was written before the invention of the internet.
• You say that the Qur'an says that you should respect the beliefs and religion of others. Throughout your many threads on this topic you clearly have no respect for the religion of others and you believe that you are right all of the time which leads on to my next point.
• The way in which you present your opinions is stupid. You present them as 'facts'. There is no consolidated proof that what you are saying is 'fact' and its all open to interpretation. My point is that you say the Qur'an says you must be peaceful in your teachings. However the way in which you display your opinion is very aggressive and forceful. Its almost as though you won't take suggestions from others, you won't try to explain things and you think you are correct despite criticisms that other people offer. You simply state something and back it up with a quote. There is no proof that these quotes are no more valid than quotes from other religious scriptures, but you continue to put them across as facts.

I didn't criticise anyone or any religion.

Another point that also shows you contradicting yourself is about translations. You keep reiterating a point that it has remained in its original form. What proof do you have for this? Also, you said this

Gods word were revealed in arabic, in the sense my point was none of the arabic text have been changed, but the only slight problem is the some of translational errors by scholars in english as Arabic like any other language have words with many meanings.

That part of the post in itself is contradictory. I haven't taken it out of context but there you are clearly saying that there have been mis translations when in the exact same post, and in many others, you have said it remains in its original form.

And also, just a very very small grammatical point which makes my opinion of you as someone who follows Islam go even lower, you would know that 'Quran' is grammatically incorrect and as a good follower you would know it is 'Qu'ran'.

Quran grammitically inncorrect, are you sure you read the quran in arabic?