Quote:
Originally posted by usaFtw
By saying true, i guess you agree to the fact that English is an Indo-European language. But you say that becuase india was colonised by Britain, India is influened.... ?
....i dont understand what your saying people in India still speak the dozens of languages that they already had. 
|
If our language is like their language (or has influences) then their language is like ours- (or has influences!) and i was just pointing out that as Europe was settled in first- it is likely that India derived from Europe and not vice versa.
Quote:
Originally posted by usaFtw
and that has to be wrong otherwise, the languages of Aboriginal Australians are now Indo-European, just becuase british people colonised them, even tho they still speak there aboriginal languages ...
|
Why would that make it wrong? Languages develop- some faster than others- especially those further away from the source.
Quote:
Originally posted by usaFtw
i dont know why you keep using the term colonised, Im obviously talking about pre-civilisation here...
|
Ok, I shouldn't have used that word. I meant that Europe was the first place nomads from Africa traveled to (pre-civilisation)- and this is generally accepted by historians- meaning India would be derived from Europe.
Quote:
Originally posted by usaFtw
Im obviously not saying north europeans are out right albinos but Im saying they progressed GENETICALLY FROM ALBANISM.
|
This isn't true. Skin pigmentation was a process that would have developed gradually over thousands of years. Albinos are born white- it is a freak condition and incredibly rare. A black albino is still genetically black for example, even though they look white- so your theory falls flat.
Quote:
Originally posted by usaFtw
secondly its common statistics that north european people are more prone to cancer and eyesite problems. (Im NOT BEING RACIST) becuase i acknowledge that everyone can get cancer and so on....
|
This has nothing to do with albinism. Just because you can find correlation between two sets of data doesn't mean there is a link.
Ever heard the joke on correlation statistics? There is correlation between a dcrease in pirates and an increase in global warming- CLEAR correlation! But that doesn't mean there's a link between the two
