Quote:
Originally posted by tooperfect
I wouldn't wear fur in the first place not because of the ethics but I just wouldn't buy it. I think in the documentary the bit where it showed how the animals lived in cages all there lives and skinned whilst alive was utterly wrong and I'm not defending it. I belive that there should be some kind of 'free range' fur like it showed in the prohramme where the animals lived a free and healthy life but just ran into a trap and died, I wouldn't be against it if it was recognised and labeled as 'free range'.
|
This has gotta be one of the stupidest things I've ever read on here. So it would be ok for someone to look "pretty" (pretty ugly, shallow, dense that is...) in a fur coat as long as the animal got to run around for a bit before its' life was snatched away to satisfy some ugly d*ckhead's vanity?
You watched the programme then? You saw the beautiful white fox still moving its' head & blinking its' eyes at the camera whilst being skinned alive? And you still say it's ok for humans to use animals for their own selfish , stupid ends? Still think there are instances where the fur would still look better on some fat fukk with more money than sense than on the beautiful creature it belonged to?
Free range fur indeed.
