Quote:
Originally posted by gavinh2008
Quote:
Originally posted by razorbladeromance
Quote:
Originally posted by gavinh2008
Quote:
Originally posted by razorbladeromance
Quote:
Originally posted by gavinh2008
Quote:
Originally posted by razorbladeromance
So Rachel has sites. Fantastic. Does that bear any relevance to her entertainment value? No. Superstar is a bit much. She is just a really nice person with good looks and thats about it.
|
She has been in commercials and films and tv stuff, thats what is meant by superstar, it is no way a reference to BB no matter how "boring" she's been on it.
|
Yes. And superstar is STILL crossing the line. Besides, she came to prominence more in BB than she did from anything else prior. She is not a superstar. And she is DEFINATELY not a BB superstar.
|
Well obviously the person who made this thread sees Rachel as a superstar in hers/his eyes and wanted to share all the stuff she has been in, its just their opinion
|
Superstar is a media status though, not an opinion. She is simply nowhere near being a superstar in terms of fanbase or exposure.
|
It can be used as an admireable referance to brandstifer (sp?) favourite housemate. I call my mam a superstar, but she isnt famous, I call her that because of the way she deals with things in everyday life
|
I understand the point you are making but taking a look at all the links posted, the topic creator was obviously refrencing to Rachel as being a 'superstar' in terms of status also.