Quote:
Originally posted by bananarama
Both Science and Derick are supremely bad examples of what youngsters should develop into.
Science is an arrogant over bearing git with no time to absorb and understand what others are saying.. A man that seldom listens will never learn... Socially he is the worst mess of an example you could think of.....Having said that I don't regard him as a bad person in any way. He is just a mess when it comes to communicating and understanding other points of view... Science to Lose...
Derick. Is at the other end of the social spectrum and every bit as bad as Science but in a different way.
His posh stance is outdated and as old as the hills and in itself intimidating . He uses poshness to bully and show off his belief he is superior to all. Being posh does not automatically mean one is intelligent or nice. He is neither. Intelligence in Dereck has been replaces by basic animal cunning...Don't be fooled by the Dereck's of this world. There are a lot of such false idiots roaming about parliament right now. Dereck to lose..
I just hope no one ever grows up to be like either of them...
|
I totally agree with your comments on Derek, he is actually a worse role model that what Science is imo, Science while a very loud and irritional person he is still young but has a compassionate side, Derek on the other hand see's life as just one big game and he totally manipulates people. He is in one the most ruthless professions and when has a politician ever been seen to be a nice person. He think's of himself as a leader and a gentleman but you are right he is a bully and he abuses his posistion as an older person in the house to bully others.
The way he keeps on about being ashamed of his own race is a poor example to set and he is almost like a black man trapped in a white racist man's body.