Quote:
Originally posted by David
If it was a vote to eliminate then maybe, but I doubt this will happen on a vote to save. They won't be eliminated if they're in the bottom 2 anyway.
|
Yeah Imo it would of been much better if it was to "Get Rid Of" and not to "Save" because if it was a negative vote, imo Daniel would of left already. In a negative vote, Laura, Scott and Austin wouldnt of left, Daniel, Rachel and Eoghan would have imo.
Daniel would defenitley been gone because there are soo many people that want him out and people could band together to vote him out, but its really hard to do that in a vote to save.
The only way that could get rid of him is thinking tactically. (I would think that Diana, Alexandra and JLS would be safe), so the public would need to vote for either Eoghan, Rachel or Ruth loads of times to ensure Daniel gets in the bottom 2, but there are downsides to this eg. Diana ending up in the bottom 2 because everyone thought she was safe but she wasnt. Thats what I think happened on Saturday (Laura fans thought she was safe so they took a break and voted someone else).