|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 5,845
|
|
|
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 5,845
|
Um
I nevere did this in history, but I'll try and help anyhow.
Start your second paragraph with all the reasons as to WHY he was to blame, and describe it and link back to the question. Create a new paragraph for each point. Do the same for why he isn't to blame. In your conclusion say your view - it's beat to say it's half and half.
Hope I helped.
|