Quote:
Originally posted by arista
Quote:
Originally posted by Chewy
I got summat to say
**** youtube, they can go and have a little bitch fit about giving artists what they deserve, if I want to watch a music vid, I'll go to the artists website
|
Chewy
you are clever.
It is PRS who put the Price up so high,
not YouTube.
Example say PRS do your Electric Bill
from £130 a month.
Then they say its is going up to £2,130 a month.
It is not Viable
they would be out of pocket on ever Artist Video
each time it was clicked.
They are still in talks
If Google/YouTube want to be stupid
and never get many on it
they could charge per video.
But they are not wanting to do pay as you go
on You Tube it would kill it.
This is only a UK problem.
PRS are at fault here.
|
Its both sides really, I mean PRS are being fools asking for such a high but apparently Youtube are wanting the license for less than it was before.
Everyone is loosing out with this, artists main way of advertising in the UK has gone back to the late 20th Centary way of using the music channels
People cant watch their favourite music videos (and with the risk of this spreading to MySpace, it'd be worse)
and last but not least, Youtube will not be getting as many views as millions watch music videos on youtube, and with the videos blocked...